Oregon Can you conceal carry a SBR in OR with a CHL?

[RX-79G]

Again, not really relevant to the discussion, though I'd say yes they can conceal carry.

The relevant thing is CHL and SBRs.

ORS 166.262 is specific.. in that it tells LEOs that they can't be going around arresting or charging people who have either a valid CHL, or proof of being LEOs or proof of honorably discharged/retired LEOs. There are no other carveouts in this specific law for anyone else in ORS 166.260 from what I could find.

It says they shouldn't be arresting certain people for doing certain things, which isn't the same as saying they shouldn't arrest certain people from doing practically anything.

 

[RX-79G]

So... CITE the relevant ORS that says a CHL holder can be arrested or charged for violating ORS 166.250.

Cite where it says a CHL holder can't be arrested for possessing a gun after they've been adjudicated insane.

 

[CamoDeafie]

Red Herring again. There is no ORS that says a person adjudicated insane is able to legally have or keep a CHL, if that person did not get relief from that prohibition.

ORS 166.293 – Denial or revocation of license

If the application for the concealed handgun license is denied, the sheriff shall set forth in writing the reasons for the denial.…

oregon.public.law

Meaning.. the Sheriff has a duty to revoke the CHL from the person in question.

Edit. That's why the wording VALID. If a person is found insane or committed, then the Sheriff has a duty by law to revoke the CHL thereby making it INVALID, and loses the protection of the relevant ORS.

 

[CamoDeafie]

Again, mental health/illness by law... isn't relevant to the primary question of "can a valid CHL holder be arrested for violating ORS 166.250 sections (a) or (b)"? To which...ORS 166.262 makes clear... nope.

 

[solv3nt]

And you're a nobody as well. That's we are having (what ought to be) a civil discussion about how this particular law works. But you just keep insulting and not saying anything.

I'm still waiting for you to cite something other than your feelings....

 

[solv3nt]

Cite where it says a CHL holder can't be arrested for possessing a gun after they've been adjudicated insane.

Why are you changing the subject?

 

[solv3nt]

@RX-79G if you're ever curious why people here don't like you.....

 

[solv3nt]

Cite where it says a CHL holder can't be arrested for possessing a gun after they've been adjudicated insane.

If you're insane, I'm quite positive you'll lose your SBR....

 

[solv3nt]

It says they shouldn't be arresting certain people for doing certain things, which isn't the same as saying they shouldn't arrest certain people from doing practically anything.

"Should" is not a legal term. Spelt "can't" wrong....

 

[Kruel J]

Did you know it's illegal to diddle yourself in some states?

Which states??


(asking for a friend)

 

[Kruel J]

Lots of stones being thrown from glass houses.

FYI, I'm not about to moderate posts just because people's feelings are hurt. Especially when those people are the one's with transparent domiciles.

Let's get back on topic, politely.

 

[CamoDeafie]

If you're insane, I'm quite positive you'll lose your SBR....

And CHL too from what I can see.

 

[RX-79G]

Red Herring again. There is no ORS that says a person adjudicated insane is able to legally have or keep a CHL, if that person did not get relief from that prohibition.

ORS 166.293 – Denial or revocation of license

If the application for the concealed handgun license is denied, the sheriff shall set forth in writing the reasons for the denial.…

oregon.public.law

Meaning.. the Sheriff has a duty to revoke the CHL from the person in question.

Edit. That's why the wording VALID. If a person is found insane or committed, then the Sheriff has a duty by law to revoke the CHL thereby making it INVALID, and loses the protection of the relevant ORS.

Did you read it? It says that it would be "cause to revoke" and that the Sheriff "may revoke" the CHL. Where do you see "duty" or even "must revoke"?

 

[solv3nt]

Did you read it? It says that it would be "cause to revoke" and that the Sheriff "may revoke" the CHL. Where do you see "duty" or even "must revoke"?

Do you believe anything you write? Or do your fingers work faster than your eighth grade reading level brain (legislation is written at the eighth grade reading level so your can't complain about this)

 

[solv3nt]

Which states??


(asking for a friend)

I mis-spoke, some local jurisdictions.

 

[Kruel J]

Gentlemen (and I use that term loosely ) let's stop the personal attacks mmmkayyyy?

 

[RX-79G]

Do you believe anything you write? Or do your fingers work faster than your eighth grade reading level brain (legislation is written at the eighth grade reading level so your can't complain about this)

Congratulations on being able to insult me with impunity.

 

[Kruel J]

I mis-spoke, some local jurisdictions.

Whew, that's a relief!!



(for my friend)

 

[solv3nt]

And CHL too from what I can see.

Wait, am I reading this correctly? If your mentally insane, not only do they take your CHL, but they take your guns AND your SBR and no longer allow you to rock it concealed?

 

[Andy54Hawken]

I mis-spoke, some local jurisdictions.

Ha...
You said jurisdictions...
Andy