- Messages
- 9,146
- Reactions
- 16,703
Spoken like a true believer.At least with Glocks, the cops have to shoot themselves in the junk or the leg. The gun doesn't do it for them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Spoken like a true believer.At least with Glocks, the cops have to shoot themselves in the junk or the leg. The gun doesn't do it for them.
Except this time...A P320 doesn't do it for them, either. So far, every attempt at people implicating a P320 magically firing on its own accord upon its owner has been debunked by evidence later found that points to poor/inappropriate gun handling.
Maybe not...Except this time...
That's right! Blame the bullet!To blame only the gun at this point in time is a rather spurious conclusion, when there hasn't even been an investigation.
I am completely indifferent if the leg hit the gun in the holster. A gun should not fire in that situation. Period; full stop. That it "may have a bearing upon this situation" is true. This gun likely would not have discharged without the incidental contact in the arrest. But that should not cause a gun to discharge and does not absolve anything.Maybe not...
… But I can honestly say that the perp's leg hit the gun in its holster. Might that fact have a bearing upon this situation? I think it does...
To blame only the gun at this point in time is a rather spurious conclusion, …
So anyway, just buy Glocks and that won't happen
I dont see anywhere in the vid the perps leg hitting the gun.I would like to know more of what went on when the perp's leg hit the officer's gun.
So, are you making the assumption that I think the gun fired just because the leg hit the holster? Cuz if you are, then your assumption is wrong. Are you not going to consider the possibility that there may have been foreign material within the holster that, when hit by the leg, caused the trigger to pull and the gun to fire? Cuz that would be something that I would like to wait for the investigation to determine. Period; full stop.I am completely indifferent if the leg hit the gun in the holster. A gun should not fire in that situation. Period; full stop. That it "may have a bearing upon this situation" is true. This gun likely would not have discharged without the incidental contact in the arrest. But that should not cause a gun to discharge and does not absolve anything.
Every one of those claims of "the massive number of 320 issues", where investigations have been concluded, have shown the gun handler to be at fault. Please cite a single adjudicated court case where the SIG P320 was indisputably at fault.It is very clear from the video the massive number of 320 issues have a very solid footing in some kind of design defect. Too many trained professionals have had the gun discharge while holstered. This video is rapidly going to become "Plaintiff's Exhibit C" in a whole raft of lawsuits.
Watch this. Slow it down to 1/4-speed if you have to. I did, and I clearly saw the perp's left leg hit the holster.I dont see anywhere in the vid the perps leg hitting the gun.
But a holster obstruction, or modified holster flexing may be a cause.
Wow good video. You can clearly see that the trigger is v covered in the holster and when the gun goes off. Looks to me like the detainee's leg hit the pistol when he picked him up which caused it to go off (Basically the same as a drop discharge).This one was caught on Video officers holstered sig discharged
The police department is spending 20K to replace its Sigs with Glock after the discharge
Montville police will replace handguns due to safety concerns
Jul. 27—MONTVILLE — Three days after a police officer's handgun "spontaneously discharged" while he was arresting a suspect in the police station lobby, the police department has announced it will replace all officers' handguns with a different model. Chief Wilfred Blanchette said Thursday the...www.yahoo.com
Wow just saw your post and you posted exactly the same stills as me and even used the same arrow. Sorry I wouldn't have posted if I saw yours. Great minds and all... ha ha!Strange..... I didn't even "click" the video, and it started playing.
__
For the real Didn't Clickers -
View attachment 1461057
View attachment 1461081
click for the big picture...arrow parallel to the path of the discharged round.
If only Glock made Sigs, we wouldn't be having these conversations….Well Glocks are superior so…..
I've got it, the officers gun had a non department hair trigger (illegally installed of course) and it appears that the perp has really hairy legs and one of them hairs was tickling that trigger when he got picked up.Maybe not...
I would like to know more of what went on when the perp's leg hit the officer's gun. Clearly, there was some form of interference with the holster/gun there. Did that interference cause the gun to discharge? I don't know. And I'm not claiming that I do know. But I can honestly say that the perp's leg hit the gun in its holster. Might that fact have a bearing upon this situation? I think it does...
To blame only the gun at this point in time is a rather spurious conclusion, when there hasn't even been an investigation. I'm going to wait and see what that investigation reveals before I stop carrying my P320. Every investigation in the past has concluded these "uncommanded" discharges were ultimately the fault of the guns' owners, not the guns' fault.
Someone else thought that gear from his fellow officer may have gotten into the holster.Watch this. Slow it down to 1/4-speed if you have to. I did, and I clearly saw the perp's left leg hit the holster.
To be fair I do not like Clocks either. Any gun that requires the operator to pull the trigger to field strip is a definite no-go in my line of thinking.And here I thought I liked you...