- Messages
- 2,948
- Reactions
- 2,214
Lets go point by point:
The stock market actually ate the big one in april of 2000, because people realized they had been dumping their life savings into internet companies that had no product, or if they did have a product they had no hope of actually capitalizing on it. At the same time, enron made people realize that even if a company did have a product they were never guaranteed a return because of malfeasance on the part of the people who ran the company. These are lessons that should have been obvious to anyone, however the news media at the time was awash with stories of people making big money. The problem is, in order to make money in any market you must do one fundamental thing: buy low, sell high. Whether this happens on a micro or macro scale the fundamentals have to be there. Every time something goes from high to low, people loose money, this is what all the people who bought gold are learning. Unless you buy something that has indispensable value (usually derived from utility) the value of anything can drop suddenly if no one wants to buy it. However, another market fundamental no one seems to appreciate is that there is always a need for labor.
The airline industry has several problems, first it is one of the most regulated industries in the modern world (next would be energy), they are also highly vulnerable to speculation on the commodity (namely oil) markets, as well as labor disputes. Only a fool would invest in this market, and since airlines have to compete in the same market as all other modes of transport time will tell how worthwhile it is. I personally don't like flying, in order to do so I have to pack smaller than I would normally, I have to be very attentive to what and how I pack because some jerk is going to dig through my bag and take out my shaving cream because it could be a bomb, and take my nail clippers away as I might kill someone with them. Even though flying is still relatively cheap and is usually cheaper than driving (if it's just me going) it's a mode I don't take unless I have something time critical that keeps me from driving.
See point above. Market choices made on incorrect information are usually substantially worse than those made on incomplete information.
After the 2000 and 2001 hits, people were looking for a "secure investment" for most people that took the form of tangible property, namely real estate. Huge amounts of money that fled from the stock market were poured into property and housing development, which very rapidly drove up prices, those who got in early looking for a safe haven were compromised by artificial lending practices mandated by government that drove property values beyond the range in which responsible home buyers could afford, even those that could afford were left with a choice, losing what investment they made (down payment, and house payments up to that point) to dump an asset they had overpaid for, and likely would not have paid off for 30 or more years. The artificial stimulation in the market (government intervention) is what set up the eventual end state for the housing collapse in 2008. This makes a huge case for government non-intervention.
The auto industry is probably #3 of the top 5 most regulated industries here in the US after airlines and energy, with healthcare and insurance rounding out the top 5. The auto industry is greatly affected by fuel prices (greatly affects consumer preference), as well as labor and supply issues. I really think government bailouts did nothing but continue to distort the market, by going bankrupt the automotive companies would have been able to unload themselves from much of the pay raises, pension and healthcare benefits they had foolishly signed up for in better times via union agreements. A bankruptcy restructuring would have given the automotive companies opportunities to improve their operations significantly, streamline supply chain. However the bailouts of automotive companies was doing nothing but ensuring the union bosses would still be employed. Again, this is a negative case for regulation and government intervention. All it has done is sew the seeds for future failure.
As it turns out, the world doesn't need that many lawyers, nor do we need philosophy, communications, psychology, art, or literature majors. What we need are civil/mechanical/electrical/chemical engineers, doctors, nurses, mathematicians, and scientists. The big lie sold to people is that they need a college education to succeed, and most employers believe this also because of the failure of public primary school education. It is also illegal in many cases to use aptitude testing as a basis for hiring decisions, this gives an edge to college graduates, however college graduates are usually saddled with tens of thousands in debt, which requires them to find a high paying job to have any hope of repaying student loans (the only kind of debt which cannot be discharged through bankruptcy). In this case, because of the failure of public education, and the high "government guaranteed" loan subsidy rate for higher education the growth in fees charged by every college or university has outpaced inflation by a geometric rate. Again, this is a case where government has perverted the market.
When people wake up in the morning, they should stand in line and instead of being grateful that the government has rolled out the red carpet at the soup line they should be angry that the government is the embodiment of failure in the modern age. They should be angry at the unions who protected ineffective, ineffectual teachers who showed up to get their guaranteed paychecks, pay raises and gratuitous pension benefits with no expectation of actually having any ability or will to do their jobs. They should be angry with the politicians who campaigned on promises of more accountability, less corruption, and better government who delivered none if it.
And perhaps after that, they should be angry at themselves for not doing anything about it sooner. Ensuring that local, state and federal politics is nothing but a revolving door for the same group of ignorant, self absorbed, corrupt scumbags they didn't like in high school. Then maybe they should channel that anger into something constructive, whether it be finding, funding and running candidates who will bring about real change, real reform and smaller government, or running themselves. Something has to be done, and it can't be done by just complaining about it on the internet.
Lets sleep on it,
The United States economy took a major hit on September 12, 2001. Many stocks crashed and consumers lost faith in various industries. Since September of 2001, a variety of industries in the United States have been hit very hard. One of the first industries to begin laying-off workers was the airline industry, which began in late 2001, early 2002.
The stock market actually ate the big one in april of 2000, because people realized they had been dumping their life savings into internet companies that had no product, or if they did have a product they had no hope of actually capitalizing on it. At the same time, enron made people realize that even if a company did have a product they were never guaranteed a return because of malfeasance on the part of the people who ran the company. These are lessons that should have been obvious to anyone, however the news media at the time was awash with stories of people making big money. The problem is, in order to make money in any market you must do one fundamental thing: buy low, sell high. Whether this happens on a micro or macro scale the fundamentals have to be there. Every time something goes from high to low, people loose money, this is what all the people who bought gold are learning. Unless you buy something that has indispensable value (usually derived from utility) the value of anything can drop suddenly if no one wants to buy it. However, another market fundamental no one seems to appreciate is that there is always a need for labor.
1. The airline industry was, of course, directly affected by the events of September 11, 2001. A majority of Americans did not want to fly anymore and they lost confidence in the airline industry itself and its ability to protect Americans from terrorist attacks. Most airlines had major layoffs beginning in late 2001 and early 2002. There was also a pilot strike in the 2000s, which left the industry almost broken. However, even though the airline industry is still not what it was before September 11, it is moving forward towards some type of recovery.
The airline industry has several problems, first it is one of the most regulated industries in the modern world (next would be energy), they are also highly vulnerable to speculation on the commodity (namely oil) markets, as well as labor disputes. Only a fool would invest in this market, and since airlines have to compete in the same market as all other modes of transport time will tell how worthwhile it is. I personally don't like flying, in order to do so I have to pack smaller than I would normally, I have to be very attentive to what and how I pack because some jerk is going to dig through my bag and take out my shaving cream because it could be a bomb, and take my nail clippers away as I might kill someone with them. Even though flying is still relatively cheap and is usually cheaper than driving (if it's just me going) it's a mode I don't take unless I have something time critical that keeps me from driving.
2. The financial industry started to go downhill after the Enron Corporation was exposed for fraud and deceiving its' stockholders. Again, consumers lost faith in their investments and companies that were doing the investing. Since Enron, other major financial companies have faced similar charges of deception and fraud.
See point above. Market choices made on incorrect information are usually substantially worse than those made on incomplete information.
3. Because many people have either lost their jobs or cannot find jobs to begin with, the housing market has taken a hit. The housing market is very complex in the sense that not only are people unable to buy homes because they have less money, but also the banks made bad investments in people by giving out loans to people who could not afford to pay their mortgages once the economy took a turn for the worse. Now, to recover some of the money they lost, banks are no longer lending as much and therefore are limiting the amount of money they loan to consumers for homes.
After the 2000 and 2001 hits, people were looking for a "secure investment" for most people that took the form of tangible property, namely real estate. Huge amounts of money that fled from the stock market were poured into property and housing development, which very rapidly drove up prices, those who got in early looking for a safe haven were compromised by artificial lending practices mandated by government that drove property values beyond the range in which responsible home buyers could afford, even those that could afford were left with a choice, losing what investment they made (down payment, and house payments up to that point) to dump an asset they had overpaid for, and likely would not have paid off for 30 or more years. The artificial stimulation in the market (government intervention) is what set up the eventual end state for the housing collapse in 2008. This makes a huge case for government non-intervention.
4. More recently, the automobile industry has struggled partially because of major product recalls and partially because they had to accept tax payer money in the form of a "bailout." Of course, consumer confidence in the automobile industry has decreased dramatically because of the recalls and because consumers watched as more and more companies came forward for bailout money.
The auto industry is probably #3 of the top 5 most regulated industries here in the US after airlines and energy, with healthcare and insurance rounding out the top 5. The auto industry is greatly affected by fuel prices (greatly affects consumer preference), as well as labor and supply issues. I really think government bailouts did nothing but continue to distort the market, by going bankrupt the automotive companies would have been able to unload themselves from much of the pay raises, pension and healthcare benefits they had foolishly signed up for in better times via union agreements. A bankruptcy restructuring would have given the automotive companies opportunities to improve their operations significantly, streamline supply chain. However the bailouts of automotive companies was doing nothing but ensuring the union bosses would still be employed. Again, this is a negative case for regulation and government intervention. All it has done is sew the seeds for future failure.
5. Currently, lawyers have either lost their jobs and many recent graduates are also unable to find positions. Because thousands of college graduates are unable to find jobs, they are staying in school to earn a graduate degree. Now, there is a surplus of lawyers and not enough jobs to go around. This will be a problem for decades as the number of people who are attending law school is increasing, while the amount of jobs available are either staying the same or decreasing.
As it turns out, the world doesn't need that many lawyers, nor do we need philosophy, communications, psychology, art, or literature majors. What we need are civil/mechanical/electrical/chemical engineers, doctors, nurses, mathematicians, and scientists. The big lie sold to people is that they need a college education to succeed, and most employers believe this also because of the failure of public primary school education. It is also illegal in many cases to use aptitude testing as a basis for hiring decisions, this gives an edge to college graduates, however college graduates are usually saddled with tens of thousands in debt, which requires them to find a high paying job to have any hope of repaying student loans (the only kind of debt which cannot be discharged through bankruptcy). In this case, because of the failure of public education, and the high "government guaranteed" loan subsidy rate for higher education the growth in fees charged by every college or university has outpaced inflation by a geometric rate. Again, this is a case where government has perverted the market.
If the above information can tell us anything, it is that when consumers lose faith in an industry, the company should brace for hard times. Consumers are what drive all industries and when consumers and investors lose confidence in any given company, there will be severe consequences. In order to start solving the problems of many of these industries, companies must attempt to gain consumer trust and confidence in order to move forward.
But good luck with that as we are losing faith in our leaders, our jobs and our retirement !
This is all happening why Americans sleep on it, they hope, pray they will wake up and the world is now 1984 and all is well.
People are wanting changes in the way America is run ( nothing new ) but we are in a bad slump and recovery won't come easy or clean.
As people attack our rights and leave us at the soup line we have allot of dispare.
But we need hope to give confidence back to this country, with hope comes trust and hopefully a recovery.
When people wake up in the morning, they should stand in line and instead of being grateful that the government has rolled out the red carpet at the soup line they should be angry that the government is the embodiment of failure in the modern age. They should be angry at the unions who protected ineffective, ineffectual teachers who showed up to get their guaranteed paychecks, pay raises and gratuitous pension benefits with no expectation of actually having any ability or will to do their jobs. They should be angry with the politicians who campaigned on promises of more accountability, less corruption, and better government who delivered none if it.
And perhaps after that, they should be angry at themselves for not doing anything about it sooner. Ensuring that local, state and federal politics is nothing but a revolving door for the same group of ignorant, self absorbed, corrupt scumbags they didn't like in high school. Then maybe they should channel that anger into something constructive, whether it be finding, funding and running candidates who will bring about real change, real reform and smaller government, or running themselves. Something has to be done, and it can't be done by just complaining about it on the internet.