It makes no mention of punishment in your citation....A person is guilty of a separate offense for each and every gun sold or transferred without complying with the background check requirements of RCW 9.41.113.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It makes no mention of punishment in your citation....A person is guilty of a separate offense for each and every gun sold or transferred without complying with the background check requirements of RCW 9.41.113.
You won't regret it. It's going to be amazing!No. Probably next week.
If I do regret it, I'm holding you personally responsible.You won't regret it. It's going to be amazing!
Which gun did you send in?If I do regret it, I'm holding you personally responsible.
I'm not sure how, yet. Give me a few days on that.
M9Which gun did you send in?
The OP is the one making the claim, it's on him to prove his accusations. How do you expect anyone else to prove a negative?The OP is liar? Citation?
I could be convinced
Would you prefer the OP makes public the PMs he's talking about?The OP is the one making the claim, it's on him to prove his accusations. How do you expect anyone else to prove a negative?
We stopped caring about op long ago, but your claims....Would you prefer the OP makes public the PMs he's talking about?
I was talking about yours if you don't like itDO IT!
(I'm a great salesman!)
Orange u gwad heez keyping dis gooing fo so dong?We stopped caring about op long ago, but your claims....
Interestingly enough, you had the correct section first, you just red it wong.
I'm not quick on the take. Shut up. MOOOOOOMMMMI was talking about yours if you don't like it
I'll remind you that the post that got all of your underpants in a wad was the suggestion that anyone trying to use the forum for illegal purposes ought to be banned.We stopped caring about op long ago, but your claims....
Interestingly enough, you had the correct section first, you just red it wong.
Our panties got bunched when you made the claim that two at a time is a felony, then you got upset that we weren't following along with an incorrect reading of the laws.I'll remind you that the post that got all of your underpants in a wad was the suggestion that anyone trying to use the forum for illegal purposes ought to be banned.
That doesn't mean that I know it was happening. But for some reason the very idea that criminals can't use the forum really offends you patriots.
I've already got four Langdon 92s. In fact, I swapped out my blued Wilson with the LTT Elite Compact for the summer, and she's currently on my hip.I'm not quick on the take. Shut up. MOOOOOOMMMM
These trolls live off this sheot.Our panties for bunched when you made the claim that two at a time is a felony, then you got upset that we weren't following along with an incorrect reading of the laws.
No, you're suggesting a rando on the internet should just be taken at their word.Would you prefer the OP makes public the PMs he's talking about?
I have no idea what you're talking about.No, you're suggesting a rando on the internet should just be taken at their word.
My pecker is bigger than yours.
That's a hip hip!I've already got four Langdon 92s. In fact, I swapped out my blued Wilson with the LTT Elite Compact for the summer, and she's currently on my hip.