- Messages
- 430
- Reactions
- 233
The hole in my can is not big enough for .452!You have a suppressed .357 and you want a suppressed .355? I don't get it. Sounds to me like you need another suppressed Rossi in .452
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The hole in my can is not big enough for .452!You have a suppressed .357 and you want a suppressed .355? I don't get it. Sounds to me like you need another suppressed Rossi in .452
You may feel differently when you're over 40 and develop presbyopiaI do but I'm outside the norm, I actually prefer open sights, not a single gun I own has optics and I wouldn't have it any other way.
I've never had a problem hitting a target indoors or outdoors with nothing but irons, I see other people my age shoot mostly with red dots and it makes me cringe.(I'm 25)
You want a new rifle but not a new can? Weird.The hole in my can is not big enough for .452!
This gives me an idea - I've heard the .308 Winchester and the 7.62 NATO cartridge are based on the .300 Savage.True that. Of all our long guns, only two rifles are scoped. One is for medium sized game (Savage 99) while the other for varmints (customized Ruger Mini-14).* The rest sport iron sights.
* These fellows.
View attachment 515808
View attachment 515809
why not just get DeLisle?The hole in my can is not big enough for .452!
You want a new rifle but not a new can? Weird.
It seems like you already have a great 9 mm-ish suppressed rifle (and I'm envious). You can buy A LOT of .357/.38 brass and components for the price of a 9 mm rifle, so even if it was a thing, why?
For those who don't already have a Rossi, it would make sense.
I'm 40 years older with (sorta) the same attitude. Less so as I age but irons still work for me. One observation though , I can hit a target with irons at a much greater distance than I can properly identify it.I do but I'm outside the norm, I actually prefer open sights, not a single gun I own has optics and I wouldn't have it any other way.
I've never had a problem hitting a target indoors or outdoors with nothing but irons, I see other people my age shoot mostly with red dots and it makes me cringe.(I'm 25)
I see no reason for optics unless shooting at extreme long range, like you need to kill a bad guy a mile away with a Barret m82 .50 BMG or Cheytac .408, otherwise I see no need for optics.
I see no reason for optics unless shooting at extreme long range, like you need to kill a bad guy a mile away with a Barret m82 .50 BMG or Cheytac .408, otherwise I see no need for optics.