- Messages
- 9,133
- Reactions
- 16,678
Another poster brought this up - sigfreund on SIGforumAll the arguments against Sig have been flawed. And the more we dig into this the more evidence it's the user.
But the real irony here is the huge elephant in the closet, a manual safety. Sadly, I dont see the community or industry admitting that anytime soon.
Confirmation Bias - the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories
The second paragraph in quotes is exactly how Montville PD handled their recent ND.
But if we're going to ask why other guns don't have the problem, what about has been asked about the P320? Why is it only LEOs whose guns seem to go off by themselves? I suspect the reports are a form of confirmation bias. As an example I've used before, if a rookie cop walked into his chief's office and claimed that his Glock had gone off by itself, he'd be laughed out of the place, if not fired on the spot. Once a product gets a reputation that's picked up in the popular consciousness, that grows on itself.
"What the hell happened?
"I don't know why it fired; it just seemed to go off by itself."
"Yeah, those P320s have that problem. Do a Google search."
"Hey, chief, everyone else is having the same problem. It wasn't anything I did."
Manual Safety
That's another issue as mentioned by 1775usmc above.
However, I think it could be argued that if SIG had offered a MS version as optional on the P320, maybe they wouldn't have the monkey on their back.