Oh yeah, that is a good one.Don't forget Bangor (SSBM base on the Hood Canal between Poulsbo and Silverdale) and JBLM
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh yeah, that is a good one.Don't forget Bangor (SSBM base on the Hood Canal between Poulsbo and Silverdale) and JBLM
Good Post @bumpus. All good thoughts. I think you are good in Medford.I can not forsee the pacific coast being stormed by anybody else's forces.
The only "alien invasion" is the one that has been pouring over our southern border for many years now.
I think if there is a nuke strike, it will be sudden and involve the Seattle-Tacoma area, and possibly Frisco and LA on the west coast. Likely there would be pockets that would be emp'd and have no power.
Likely it would involve our INLAND MISSLE batteries, many US Bases, and several of our remote military bases. The East coast could see several detonations as well. Of course, DC.
No special preps needed in my opinion, just food, medicines, a way to make power and a way to purify water. Many ways to protect what is left....
Be a good neighbor, that sort of thing. The way in which you respond to a crisis will forever define you as a big hero or a big zero. Be a hero.
One might make that argument about globalism. One might also make the argument that globalism is something.... else.Globalism is nothing other than capitalism.
Not sure why so many are embracing…. Something else….
And then we will know how far they got in school.One might make that argument about globalism. One might also make the argument that globalism is something.... else.
And given your avatar and your location, which is across the river from mine, you're pretty much correct...Face it, if the war goes nuclear there ain't many safe places remaining. Even FEMA admits that.
FEMA Map Shows Potential Nuclear Targets in U.S. as Tensions with Russia and China Increase [VIDEO] * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Amber Crawford
As tensions build with Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, the West faces an increased threat of nuclear warfare. A […]100percentfedup.com
And given your avatar and your location, which is across the river from mine, you're pretty much correct...
Russia has an estimated just under 6000 Nuclear warheads bumpus. I can't say how many are Tactical vs Strategic (ICBM's- internet says 1500+), how many are being serviced or not operable due to lack of service, or even where they are directed: but that Intel plant out in Hillsboro would be a target IMO. A single warhead would fire up all of our Pac. NW wood framed buildings that didn't fall down due to the blast.I can not forsee the pacific coast being stormed by anybody else's forces.
The only "alien invasion" is the one that has been pouring over our southern border for many years now.
I think if there is a nuke strike, it will be sudden and involve the Seattle-Tacoma area, and possibly Frisco and LA on the west coast. Likely there would be pockets that would be emp'd and have no power.
Likely it would involve our INLAND MISSLE batteries, many US Bases, and several of our remote military bases. The East coast could see several detonations as well. Of course, DC.
No special preps needed in my opinion, just food, medicines, a way to make power and a way to purify water. Many ways to protect what is left....
Be a good neighbor, that sort of thing. The way in which you respond to a crisis will forever define you as a big hero or a big zero. Be a hero.
The Puget Sound is the primary target of the PNW, Portland is secondary due its population and being a port - so if there is a second round sent, Portland would be one of the targets.but that Intel plant out in Hillsboro would be a target IMO
I'm not familiar with current accuracy of Russian missiles, but 40 years back, when it was discussed that US missiles were more accurate, the accuracy of USSR products would be off by 100-200 yards MAX. So they'll be landing where they are targeted unless we have some magic wand. Of course as you say, Puget sound would be a much bigger target, the list why that is true is very long. However, assuming the Russians have 1500 operational ICBM's, and there are only 50 states to distribute those 1500 missiles, we can sleep easy knowing that we all are looking at the same BS coming our way, more or less, given that 50 divided by 1500 means each state could easily get 30 warheads. Assuming that Washington, being a better state, would attract more than Portland, lets say that they get their 30 and a few more for good luck, that leaves quite a few for Oregon. Certainly some states, like Minnesota, would not require as many, where as California would need a few extra. At that point we are all dead or wishing we were.The Puget Sound is the primary target of the PNW, Portland is secondary due its population and being a port - so if there is a second round sent, Portland would be one of the targets.
Our missiles are supposed to be quite accurate, not so much the Russians. So, their missiles could fall short or long or to one side or another, and hit all around Portland, from the coast to the Cascades, from Chehalis to Salem, or farther afield.
That, WD-40 and a pair of Channel Locks will solve 90 percent of Life's Problems.duct tape.
That is still the case. But our own calculations indicate that a Russian nuke would need to land only about 600 yards from a silo to destroy our own ICBM. So the Russkis' nukes are plenty accurate enough, even if they are less accurate than they were 40 years ago.I'm not familiar with current accuracy of Russian missiles, but 40 years back, when it was discussed that US missiles were more accurate, the accuracy of USSR products would be off by 100-200 yards MAX.
FIFY...However, assuming the Russians have 1500 operational ICBM's, and there are only 50 states to distribute those 1500 missiles, we can sleep easy knowing that we all are looking at the same BS coming our way, more or less, given that 50 divided by 1500 means each state could easily get 300 warheads.
That, WD-40 and a pair of Channel Locks will solve 90 percent of Life's Problems.
That is still the case. But our own calculations indicate that a Russian nuke would need to land only about 600 yards from a silo to destroy our own ICBM.
FIFY...
The current production Russian ICBM (the RS-24 Yars) is equipped with between 6 to 10 MIRV warheads, with each MIRV having a yield of 150 kilotons (that's 10X the Hiroshima bomb). So that means that those 1,500 missiles will be raining down not 1,500 warheads, but up to 15,000 warheads. And each of those MIRVs are ten times as powerful as the bomb we dropped on Hiroshima. So, instead of 30 warheads per state (on average), it would 300 warheads per state, with each one 10X the power of the Hiroshima bomb. And the accuracy of the RS-24 is ~150 meters, or about 165 yards, so bottom line is we're still all phuq'd...
We'll see what happens - if it happens - hopefully not - hopefully leaders and military are not that crazy.Certainly some states, like Minnesota, would not require as many, where as California would need a few extra. At that point we are all dead or wishing we were.