Well, I've seen some pretty nonbiased information that refutes the assertions of the article posted, which brings suspicion to the legitimacy of the article.
Much better than scrutinizing an ommission of opinion while still posting information for us to play with.
Also, think of the good this site does for the community as a whole... should the owner make hostile statements on record that could possibly jeopardize the site or detract from an inclusive community?
Just trying to explain why I think Joe regularly posts articles without offering bias.
In any case, I seriously question my safety while in the yard at night with the rut coming... had a buck with a boner chasing a doe in the yard two nights ago... don't want that buck trying to impress anyone.
Much better than scrutinizing an ommission of opinion while still posting information for us to play with.
Also, think of the good this site does for the community as a whole... should the owner make hostile statements on record that could possibly jeopardize the site or detract from an inclusive community?
Just trying to explain why I think Joe regularly posts articles without offering bias.
In any case, I seriously question my safety while in the yard at night with the rut coming... had a buck with a boner chasing a doe in the yard two nights ago... don't want that buck trying to impress anyone.