- Thread Starter
- #21
Why not the M&P Compact 2.0? Better trigger, uses different mags so 13+1 capacity for 40. I just picked one up (in 9mm). Option of barrel lengths as well. Ambi safety option available.
Because they made them significantly larger than the 1.0 versions. They decided to go head to head against the Glock 19/23 rather than be much smaller overall and only gave up three rounds.
Or drop your safety requirement and one of the new single stack 10 round Glocks might work. But I gotta tell you...calling a Glock ergonomic (or more ergo than a M&P) is like calling a pig beautiful. There ain't no such thing as a beautiful pig.
New single stack Glocks are 9mm... And have you held a Gen 5? Or tried the different backstraps on one? This ain't 1987 and Glocks have some great ergos this century...