View attachment 266512
NOW I UNDERSTAND THE BURKAH
View attachment 266513
I think that's goat herpes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View attachment 266512
NOW I UNDERSTAND THE BURKAH
View attachment 266513
I think that's goat herpes
View attachment 266283
What does bombing nearly 800 civilians due to Extremist Christian beliefs inherently have to do with Anglo-Americans or Christians?
View attachment 266284
What does bombing civilians during a marathon because of Extremist Islamic beliefs inherently have to do with Anglo-Chechens or Muslims?
In both instances, I say... nothing.
A dick is a dick because of what he did. Doesn't mean a dick's parents or children are dicks by association.
Psalms 79:6: "Pour out thy wrath upon the heathen that have not known thee, and upon the kingdoms that have not called upon thy name."
Exodus 22:20: "He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed."
There are hateful speeches in all religious texts, including the Bible. Those truly pious do not pay attention to hate but worship God privately. Only the hateful use their religious texts to justify their personal rage and condone violence publicly.
The censorship machine just got a tune up and is in full swing. Pathetic!
BREAKING: Obama/Jarrett Warn FBI Director Over Anti-Muslim Tone (UPDATED)
Posted on December 4, 2015 by DCWhispers
If true, this is a scenario that appears to pit the Obama White House against FBI Director James Comey over what reports suggest is an increasingly divisive conflict between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Jarrett and federal law enforcement officials regarding feared pending ISIS terror threats inside of the United States.
Read more at <broken link removed>
Right on schedule:
NY Times advocates gun CONFISCATION in jaw-dropping 'first front-page editorial since 1920!'
December 5, 2015 | Steve Berman
In its first front-page editorial since the end of the First World War, The New York Times editorial board advocated outright gun confiscation as the solution to end violence.
Friday's above-the-fold piece headlined "The Gun Epidemic" called civilian gun ownership "a moral outrage and a national disgrace."
The @nytimes runs its first front page editorial since 1920. On gun violence. https://t.co/LIEgbFD5dt pic.twitter.com/iXkzaHqW9w
— carolynryan (@carolynryan) December 5, 2015
After 95 years of front-page silence, the Grey Lady's editors chose this particular recurrent theme touted so often in President Obama's rhetoric: A strange coincidence.
So, does this mean that no issue has mattered more to NYT editors since 1920? If so: FASCINATING. https://t.co/vetG4OP8yL
View attachment 266764
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/12/...#ixzz3tXnmmi2X
Well, on their Facebook page, that editorial has 43,000 likes - almost 1/4 of the BGC's processed just on Black Friday alone. The most popular comment? From a guy from Australia, who is so proud of his country's choice to restrict gun ownership to a very select few. In his mind, they're now living in a crime free Utopian paradise. Must be nice to be free of any actual working brain cells
I continue to be curious about where the mysterious 90% of Americans are that are 'demanding' more gun control? Seems to me that the NYT and those like them are coming to the realization that they have FAILED to convince the country to give up the right to self-defense. They have FAILED to convince the majority that surrendering a right to self-defense will keep us safer. They have FAILED to prove that gun control and gun free zones will bring peace and safety. They are a colossal failure of a newspaper staffed by colossal failures of reporters and editors. They are, in a word, irrelevant.
That's why tyrants always resort to genocide
Very good...thanks for posting.
A bit long but an excellent run down of the facts.
I see there's a lot of rhetoric here, so perhaps my question is a change of pace. Does anyone know the specifics regarding the modification "attempted" on one of the AR-15s used in the attack? They both had their California compliant magazine release modified, but one had a modification in "an attempt" to make it fully automatic. While unsuccessful, I wonder what changes were made, if that info is ever available by the ATF. I'm asking mostly to gauge their firearm knowledge, because depending on what kind of receiver and bolt the rifles have, it is possible but can also be impossibly difficult. Thoughts? I wonder what they were thinking.
It is to be expected. The coming of the Kingdom is not static, it has been on the way for 2000 years and there is an end time. Even the demons asked Jesus if He had come to torment them before the time. The demons knew there was a time limit...a set time and hell knows it.And truth be ignored too, it's absolutely amazing how deliberately ignorant so many are to what is happening.
Satan quote scripture just as well when he was tempting Christ in the wilderness.Psalms 79:6: "Pour out thy wrath upon the heathen that have not known thee, and upon the kingdoms that have not called upon thy name."
Exodus 22:20: "He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed."
There are hateful speeches in all religious texts, including the Bible. Those truly pious do not pay attention to hate but worship God privately. Only the hateful use their religious texts to justify their personal rage and condone violence publicly.
What is it with Australians?? I've seen this on other forums.The most popular comment? From a guy from Australia, who is so proud of his country's choice to restrict gun ownership to a very select few. In his mind, they're now living in a crime free Utopian paradise. Must be nice to be free of any actual working brain cells