Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 20,371
- Reactions
- 77,287
I remember when that whole Anarchists Cookbook thing first blew up, you couldn't buy it anywhere, and if caught with a copy, faced serious consequences, and were labeled as a terrorist! I found a copy at a Gun Show, along with a few books on making your own suppressors, so I bought them, knowing full well what would happen IF I got caught with them back then! Today, we know that it was all bullsh!t scare tactics, and they worked, until they didn't!I get that too, but I think where the gooberments case fails is that "intent" to become a part does not equate to "it is" a "part" that can be regulated. Much like an 80% frame/receiver. It's sold with the intent to assemble a firearm, but in it's form from the mfg... it is not a firearm. Although the arguement that they are is much stronger that they might be by appearances. With the key card.... a flat rectangular piece of metal doesn't look anything like an auto sear.
Another interesting point brought up is the 1A issue. The example given was the well known anarchrist cookbook. The authors "intent" is to instruct people on how to build destructive devices, but the book itself is protected and not an actual "destructive device"... and as far as I'm aware... neither the author, the publisher nor amazon (or other media retailers) have ever been charged with a crime for providing information intended to be used to mfg illegal destructive devices. Or... for promoting the sale of an illegal part/device.
Kind of like a key card is not in an of itself a "part", but a guide on how to construct one.