Bronze Lifetime
- Messages
- 12,592
- Reactions
- 28,754
Story's so believable because insurance commissioner Mike Kreidler is just that kind of ulcerated, syphilitic Commie dick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My bet is that's exactly what's happening, go after the NRA head-on, try to crack the toughest nut first and then use precedent to tell USCCA/ACLDN/PDN "shut it down unless you want some of that too".I have Armed Citizen's Legal Defense Network Inc. membership myself. They are based in Washington State.
ACLDN
Or are the just targeting the NRA first before going after other companies that offer the somewhat same insurance?
So it's basically like car insurance I pay every month .but if I drink and drive and cause a ACCEDENT.
My insurance doesn't cover me.
Great I get that .but if I pay for self-defense insurance.and I murder someone.
It doesn't cover me.
Great I get that .
But to say I can't buy insurance for a lawyer in advance of a self defense Shooting .
Well .I don't plan on drinking and driving eather.
So I don't need car insurance .
Because every ACCEDENT I get in will be the other guy or girls fault.right.
This is a political hit job on the NRA.
I was not aware of the NRA Carry Guard issue, but I began some catch-up reading after calling USCCA today to find out why my credit card hadn't been charged for membership renewal in February. The simple answer, I discovered, is that I can no longer be covered in Washington. A polite conversation with Stephanie was followed by an informative email which encouraged wide dissemination on social media. I'll attempt to paste the text here.Just got off the phone with USCCA. Their rep explained they are monitoring the situation closely and that my membership is still valid. Basically they said that since USCCA is a membership in a club that does many ither things than legal aid we should be good but time will tell.
Well all I can say is WASHINGTON STATE HAS PUT A TARGET ON THE BACK OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
NOW THEY ARE AFTER US.
the law abiding people .
The ones that can DEFEND ourselves .
And back up a OFFICER.IN NEED OF HELP.
THIS IS WHERE WE NEED HEAD LAW ENFORCEMENT TO STEP UP.
AND SAY SOMETHING.
BUT THAT WON'T HAPPEN.
.
WITCH MAKES IT EASY FOR ME TO SAY .
YOU COME TO MY HOUSE TO TAKE MY GUNS!
PACK A LUNCH
Yeah...So...basically, you AND YOUR FAMILY will probably have to lbe financially destroyed, loose everything and go bankrupt. House, cars,...savings...college funds...everything...gone...unless you happen to have at least $100K+ liquid assets immediately available to get started, and your employer doesn't fire you.
Then maybe...just maybe... possibly years down the road...cross your fingers and hope for reimbursement.
Stellar plan...divide & conquer, dissuade, dissuade, dissuade....
Hard to believe how anti law-abiding-gun-owner this state has gone in the last 5 years.
Boss
my question now , would be, does having a lawyer on retainer, go against this ruling ?I don't think this is what the insurance covered. From the article it stated an upfront payment was made to cover defense costs. If that is true, then there is the problem. This is different than having a policy to reimburse you for attorney costs after the fact.
I agree it's an NRA hit job. If this was insurance for pretty much anything else I'd bet that all the state would have done is issued a cease and desist order and threaten with a fine if they continued.
That's the next step... one way or another, by hook or crook, if they can't make you a Prohibited Person they intend to ruin your life financially and make you a slave of The State.my question now , would be, does having a lawyer on retainer, go against this ruling ?
my question now , would be, does having a lawyer on retainer, go against this ruling ?
Kinda confused, the DUI kid made a claim against your client that he hit? Nevertheless, the point the other guy was making, was if the law was consistent with this interpretation, then insurance can't cover an illegal act, so the DUI driver's insurance can't cover his accident, and your company would have to go after him personally. Obviously that's not how things work, they are just trying to make a special case for gun insurance when legally there is no special case. Seems like it would be pretty easy to change things around so it works like pre-paid legal services instead of insurance.Yes, your car insurance will cover you if you get in an accident while DUI. I work in liability auto claims, and am working a claim right now where a kid pulled out in front of our insured (He was DUI) causing the accident. We actually gave 100% fault to the kid and denied his claim, and are paying to fix our insured car. Even if you caused the accident, we would cover you as your policy states.
The only reason we deny coverage is if you purposely tried to wreck your car, like suicide or wanted to get out from under the payments.