- Messages
- 129
- Reactions
- 223
Washington state deems NRA-branded insurance program illegal
I have USCCA i wonder if they will get hit next. This is bullsh*t
I have USCCA i wonder if they will get hit next. This is bullsh*t
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well all I can say is WASHINGTON STATE HAS PUT A TARGET ON THE BACK OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.
NOW THEY ARE AFTER US.
the law abiding people .
The ones that can DEFEND ourselves .
And back up a OFFICER.IN NEED OF HELP.
THIS IS WHERE WE NEED HEAD LAW ENFORCEMENT TO STEP UP.
AND SAY SOMETHING.
BUT THAT WON'T HAPPEN.
.
WITCH MAKES IT EASY FOR ME TO SAY .
YOU COME TO MY HOUSE TO TAKE MY GUNS!
PACK A LUNCH
Lol you on first cup of coffee I'm on my last beer.lolEPS, your making perfect sense.
But stop yelling...working on my first cup of coffee.
But i wonder does USCCA and others like them suddenly become illegal? Or will time tell if their policies differ enough to remain legal?Typically insurance NEVER pays in advance of a determination of fault / guilt / liability / etc. It seems these policies pay a fee up front to allow the insured to cover defense costs. This is not a problem if the insured eventually is found innocent. It is illegal in every state for to indemnify illegal acts, so (hate to say) the state was correct in this. So if in the end the insured is found guilty, the policy now covered an illegal act. That's the problem with these policies.
Of course, since it's related to firearms the issue becomes a punching bag in the press, with you and me (gun owners) being the bag.
Typically insurance NEVER pays in advance of a determination of fault / guilt / liability / etc. It seems these policies pay a fee up front to allow the insured to cover defense costs. This is not a problem if the insured eventually is found innocent. It is illegal in every state for to indemnify illegal acts, so (hate to say) the state was correct in this. So if in the end the insured is found guilty, the policy now covered an illegal act. That's the problem with these policies.
Of course, since it's related to firearms the issue becomes a punching bag in the press, with you and me (gun owners) being the bag.