Glocks have gone 10,000 plus rounds without a hiccup. No 1911 of any barrel length has ever even remotely approached this level of reliability
an easy Internet search says otherwise....
1911 round count lifespan at DuckDuckGo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Glocks have gone 10,000 plus rounds without a hiccup. No 1911 of any barrel length has ever even remotely approached this level of reliability
They have a shorter locking system than the 1911. That's what makes it easier for them.ok so this is inherent to its swing link design?
So thats why all those plastic guns barrels are so obviously slanted upwards at sllidelock (by comparison)?
but what about 1911s with a ramped barrel?
Commanders are definitely nifty although I myself could never 100% absolutely trust a 1911 to cycle properly after the first shot. What I have never understood though is the attraction of a Commander length 1911 with a steel frame. Almost all the weight and length of a full size 5 inch gun with more difficult cartridge feeding and lower bullet velocity due to that shorter barrel. Why not go with the 28 ounce model which was specifically designed to be lighter to lug around all day?
Because the barrel has to go an even sharper angle with a shorter frame, which isn't the easiest thing to overcome in the 1911 apparently. The smaller 1911s have less room for error than the full sized ones.
Yeah. Its not impossible to make a short 1911 work, it just requires more effort and unfortunately mass production isn't THAT good.Yep. There have been far better designs since the 1911. When they first started trying to make a smaller 1911 I of course wanted to love one. Detonics came close. I just never could get one 100% Now days they have come a LONG way with the process of mass producing one that is 100%. The problem was never making a short 1911 that worked. The problem was making them in mass so you could sell them at a price a lot of people would pay.
YEP!! If you want to be able to price something for "everyone" you have to be able to crank them out by the truckload. This has long been a challenge for the short 1911. Even the full size took some work. Remember when some first started jumping into the market they had some real problems. AMT was a prime example. LOVED the look of those early stainless 1911's and their price beat Colt. Only problem was a LOT of them did not work without quite a bit of tinkering. Same with the ones made in the Philippines. When they first started they left a LOT to be desired. Company hired some good craftsmen to show them how to do it right and soon they were cranking out some damn fine 1911's at a price that got a LOT more people to try one.Yeah. Its not impossible to make a short 1911 work, it just requires more effort and unfortunately mass production isn't THAT good.
Ultimately, I want a full size 1911 as well. But right now I'm focused on the mid-sized (Commander) as a carry gun because the length is more optimal for my short Hobbit frame (and I am becoming more dwarf-like every day). I have a LW Commander that was my father's and for sentimental and practical reasons I won't carry it (though I shoot it often enough).
Someday I hope to have the whole family, big to small.
As for other guns, I know they're out there, but right now I'm fascinated (and perhaps a little obsessed) with the 1911 design. As I become more familiar with it I come to appreciate it more and more. Is it a perfect gun? At times this Defender certainly isn't. But it's the platform I have chosen (ignorantly or not) and I'm completely cool with the decision. I know it can work; it's just a question of learning and adapting properly to its quirks.
Certainly one could say that I made my decision to go all 1911 out of ignorance of the vast possibilities available, and they'd be right. But who cares? It's my choice.
I just don't have an answer for why the 1911 does it for me so much. Judging from the amount of them made these days I am obviously not alone these days. Damn seems like every gun maker offers some now.
except that they be wrong...Certainly one could say that I made my decision to go all 1911 out of ignorance of the vast possibilities available, and they'd be right. But who cares? It's my choice.
Sorry but that is nothing but a bunch of individual anecdotes and the claim that frames can last 6000 rounds. Nothing about rigorous government tests with actual misfires, failures to feed, failures to extract, and stovepipes noted over thousands of rounds and different cleaning schedules. Talk to an experienced military armorer and they will tell you about repair rates for 1911s.
Our military branches have just gone to the SIG 320 to replace the Beretta which itself replaced the 1911. Reliability of both of the newer guns in testing was a key reason they were adopted.
No one is preventing you from loving your .45, just don't make up stories about it. It is tightly machined with lot's of parts and those parts break.
Going from the full sized 1911 to the commander is significantly easier than the defender. The 1911's locking system is longer than the other ones, which makes shortening the barrel difficult.When I had a foray into 1911's I owned 3 Defender-sized pistols and they all suffered from failures. I truly believe I must have been limp-wristing them or somehow causing the failures with my form in some way, but since I'd never had such issues with subcompact striker-fired pistols, I just left that class of pistol entirely. I never had any issues with commander-sized 1911's though. However, I really preferred ones with a bobbed mainspring housing for carry!!
[QUOTE="James Hedman, All longterm reliability tests on the 1911 have more than confirmed this. Glocks have gone 10,000 plus rounds without a hiccup. No 1911 of any barrel length has ever even remotely approached this level of reliability.
/QUOTE]
<Sigh>, this is another example of the "watering hole" myth stuff. It is totally untrue. It 's stuff like this that gets passed around at the local watering hole and such in the day, now on the net. Many would then repeat it until many "thought" is must be fact. It's not. It's VERY common to have a 1911 that goes the owners lifetime and never hangs up. One of mine I have owned since the early 80's like this. I finally stopped carrying it long ago since some of the parts were made during WWI and sooner or later something else is bound to break. Even though parts of it have literally broken while shooting it has never failed to work for me. Another of mine was my Fathers. He and I did a lot of shooting until he left. It's still part of my EDC rotation and of course gets shot a lot. Has not failed since it was NIB in the mid 90"s. This is a common thing. Now again for those who are afraid of the 1911 they should not carry one. You have to have confidence in the EDC gun. Just like people who are afraid of the hammer on a 1911. Many can't be confident seeing it back. If they can't they should not carry one. LOT's of great designs now. For those who can't get their head around a 1911 use something you can "feel" good with.
if all these fallacies about the 1911 being unreliable and not lasting 10K rds etc. were true it wouldn't still be the longest issued military pistol in history.