Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 37,446
- Reactions
- 129,266
Yeabut, they're SUPPOSED to shoot bad guys in the leg…..You can add LE in there as well...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeabut, they're SUPPOSED to shoot bad guys in the leg…..You can add LE in there as well...
I have had this, ahem, debate, with some competition folks that say their shooting/training translates to the real world without any negatives. This is one of those negatives, always shooting steel once and shooting cardboard twice. "Non-standard" responses should also be a part of training included as a "standard" part of training as noted in quote above. Heads, pelvic girdle (although most effective with a rifle round), multiple targets based on the threat level, etc.Double taps are for competition, 3-5 rounds minimum standard response.
Another issue with competition training is shooting faster than your reaction time and landing a bunch of hits behind the lateral midline (i.e., "in the back"). This may require some paperwork, and attorney fees, and extra expert witness expenses. Toni McBride and her shooting of a knife-wielding suspect was a good (positive) example of how a shooter that could fire some very quick splits, throttled it back to about .5 splits, two shots at a time fired in three pairs. (And she still got hammered by the media, her department, and others.)Extra rounds for insurance, and they don't require any extra paperwork...
I just keep shooting until the target stops moving
^^^ These ^^^Double taps are for competition, 3-5 rounds minimum standard response.
Pistol rounds suck, they don't have the power a rifle does. Unless you can put rounds in the snot locker every time...give yourself some insurance.
Practice the same with rifle rounds.
Extra rounds for insurance, and they don't require any extra paperwork...
This ^^^^^Something to consider in regards to practice....
In real life you only get the shot that you get...And it may not be the one that was practiced.
Double taps...
If you think it is a good idea..or it makes you happy...why not..?
I would suggest here..
That one does not become fixated on any practice to the point of thinking that this how it is to be done all the time.
Real life and bad guys don't care how you practice...who you practiced with ...where you have trained or what you plan is.
They won't play by your rules.
Andy
In the scene where he actually implements the "double tap" rule, he shoots twice, but not in rapid succession. I love how he doesn't even know what it means. Hollywood forya.It's an essential RULE of survival.
Aloha, Mark
We have those. They're hard to find and not reusable, but totally worth it. We call them raccoons.Good topic! The rule I follow is to continue firing until the bad guy is no longer a threat (not standing, turned and running away, etc). Determining whether or not they are still a threat requires reassessment of the target during the course of fire. When the target is static you can stop after an arbitrary number (2, 3, 4, or 5 shots) and simulate reassessment, but that method doesn't force you to make a decision based on new information. I would love to have a dynamic target that changes positions (turns, lowers, etc) at random so you have to really reassess during a course of fire.
To me reassessment is necessary because the 4th rule of gun safety is "know your target, as well as what is around and beyond it". Self defense shootings are going to involve movement - by the good guy, the bad guy(s), and bystanders. You may have a good backstop when you start shooting, but if the bad guy traverses your line of sight and you're following him with your weapon, now your backstop has changed. If he goes from facing forward to running away, now his status as threat/non-threat may have changed. If bystanders run across your line of fire, you now have non-threats downrange that your fire may hit. For those reasons I think it's essential to train to stop and reassess. It's just really hard to train that on static targets, so the value of that training in real world applications is limited at best unless the targets or their positioning change.Just my way of thinking but I don't see any value in practicing "reassessment" personally. I do see tons of value in engaging multiple targets at multiple ranges though. Moving targets would be ideal but hard to do. Shooting from uncomfortable positions, moving yourself, etc is helpful I think. The less comfortable, relaxed, and slow fire the better imo. Most people are going to jerk the trigger in a surprise life and death situation. But if the gun is aligned and not moving at the time you jerk the trigger, you will hit the target. Just my opinion and may not be right for others. Leatham has a great exercise where the shooter is holding on target ina firm grip. He takes a magic marker and hits the shooters trigger literally as hard as he can, moving the shooters body backwards even, and every shot hits the target because the gun is not moving at the time the shot goes off.
Yeah, about them "rules"…. ever since I was a skeeter-wing Army privet, I considered them more of a….. guideline or a suggestion.Something to consider in regards to practice....
In real life you only get the shot that you get...And it may not be the one that was practiced.
Double taps...
If you think it is a good idea..or it makes you happy...why not..?
I would suggest here..
That one does not become fixated on any practice to the point of thinking that this how it is to be done all the time.
Real life and bad guys don't care how you practice...who you practiced with ...where you have trained or what you plan is.
They won't play by your rules.
Andy
Yeah...me too....Probably why the Army decided that I was a good fit in a LRRP / LSRD unit...Yeah, about them "rules"…. ever since I was a skeeter-wing Army privet, I considered them more of a….. guideline or a suggestion.
Yeah, about them "rules"…. ever since I was a skeeter-wing Army privet, I considered them more of a….. guideline or a suggestion.
I bet you wish you'd brought the grenades now, huh?
I started practicing quick 50 yard shots with a Glock 17 after Elisjsha Dicken dropped the Indiana mall shooter from 50 yards with a Glock 19. Dicken emptied his mag in seconds and landed (I believe) over 70% of his shots. It is impressive considering he was completely self-taught.Using an AR15 and .223. I can put 2 rounds in a 8" circle at 50 yards. The second round drifts becuase of reciol but you can still hold tight. Open to thoughts.
Due to the price of ammo it is not cost effective to give warning shots but will offer a twofer !I practice warning shots.
Just guessing but I get the impression that his idea of a warning shot involves a non-lethal bullet wound of some sort.Due to the price of ammo it is not cost effective to give warning shots but will offer a twofer !