Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 6,651
- Reactions
- 34,134
I've always thought that the person who was taking that video missed a golden opportunity. How often does bear meat and venison show up in your backyard?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NO doubt!! That's karma screaming to have the whole family over for bear burgers, beer and steak night!I've always thought that the person who was taking that video missed a golden opportunity. How often does bear meat and venison show up in your backyard?
Exactly my first thought as well.It wouldn't have been a bad idea to pop the bear, though. Once that ground is blooded, he'll be back, and next time there might be more than deer on the menu.
The same could be said of BLM and USFS these days.ODFW is horribly run by what seems to me like a bunch of environmentalist, tree hugging, hippies.
They're actually working on wooly mammoths at this time.Maybe we can reintroduce dinosaurs next...
In 1905 the federal government tried biological warfare, infecting wolves, not coyotes, with mange. Ten years later. Congress passed a law requiring wolf, but not coyote, eradication from federal land. By 1926 all wolves, not coyotes, had been poisoned, shot, and trapped out of Yellowstone National Park.This is true and I believe I read one time they are some sort of a cross between the timberwolf and some sort of larger, and more aggressive Canadian variety.
Reality being what it is there has never been a 'natural order' of things and all animals have to either adapt to their environment to survive or they will eventually disappear.
Wolves had their chance environmentally and apparently couldn't survive. Compare them to coyotes which can survive nearly anywhere and anything - including humans - and are doing quite well.
'Forced' reintroduction of a non-indigenous species of any animal, and then having to monitor it's lifestyle and movements to ensure it's safety and survival is hardly 'natural'. It's nothing more than an arrogant display of power by leftist liberal earth muffins.
I thought a few (or several) years ago on this site, someone hinted that the person who was attacked and killed by a "cougar" while hiking Mt. Hood, was attacked by "not a cougar" (and not a bear).True statement! However, wolves do kill people. There have been a number of documented attcacks on humans in recent years and 2 deaths! One in Alaska -- a school teacher out for her morning run on March 8, 2010 (Candice Berner) -- and one on November 8, 2005 in Saskatchewan (Kenton Carnegie).
They've already been a problem in certain regions for several years now. People who don't have to deal with the effects of over a dozen wolf packs, don't really know what's going on.There is a part of the urban population that are ignorant of the outdoors to say it mildly! The wilderness is "Forest Park" in Pdx
I'm fine with them reintroducing wolves if they start becoming a problem then we can hunt them just like coyotes. they live by the hard rules of nature and natural selection I feel like they have a right to the animals just like we do and I'm sure we screw their hunts up too. Look at what they did when they re-introduced them to Yellowstone the animals were no longer able to eat all the fresh trees shrubs and grasses all the way down to the ground the wolves kept the animals moving their erosion problem stopped. Nature does a much better job of managing things than we do, our management usually screws it up thoroughly.
In most parts of NE Oregon there aren't enough elk or deer left to compete with "wild bison" for food. But the bison would make a great new food source for the wolves (and probably not last long).I too would love to see Bison re-introduced. But I would expect that some hunting groups would not like the added competition for the food source.
I've personaly dealt with a large number of animal rights extremists in Lane County, Oregon and found them to be inclined to "deflect" blame away from any animal attacks from the animal itself! That was one of the common tactics they use to blame humans for any and all animal attacks. I'd highly suspect any type of "suggestion" like that, especially if the OFDW already determined it was a cougar attack. Also -- I tend to believe the OFDW has been infiltrated by some animal rights leaning people!I thought a few (or several) years ago on this site, someone hinted that the person who was attacked and killed by a "cougar" while hiking Mt. Hood, was attacked by "not a cougar" (and not a bear).
It was a couger trust me....I thought a few (or several) years ago on this site, someone hinted that the person who was attacked and killed by a "cougar" while hiking Mt. Hood, was attacked by "not a cougar" (and not a bear).
Not what I heard according to two different people, one of whom (though hearsay by the time it got to me) was involved in the search for the "cougar". The other person was the one who posted on this site not sure how they knew.It was a couger trust me....
Well I was there and seen the autopsy photos. We killed the couger, it was our dogs that treed itNot what I heard according to two different people, one of whom (though hearsay by the time it got to me) was involved in the search for the "cougar". The other person was the one who posted on this site not sure how they knew.
Thanks. I assume the photos of the autopsy (and autopsy itself), showed the cougar had remains/dna of the human victim in stomach or elsewhere.Well I was there and seen the autopsy photos. We killed the couger, it was our dogs that treed it
That information was never released to us. But the wounds where consistent with a mountain lion. The cat was taken several days later and her body was not fed on. I belive it was 7 days later the cat was caught on trail cam at the site of the attackThanks. I assume the photos of the autopsy (and autopsy itself), showed the cougar had remains/dna of the human victim in stomach or elsewhere.