Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 20,375
- Reactions
- 77,295
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wikipedia... OK.um....
Mumford Act, 1967.
"Both Republicans and Democrats in California supported increased gun control, as did the National Rifle Association of America.[9][10] Governor Ronald Reagan, who was coincidentally present on the capitol lawn when the protesters arrived, later commented that he saw "no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons" and that guns were a "ridiculous way to solve problems that have to be solved among people of good will." In a later press conference, Reagan added that the Mulford Act "would work no hardship on the honest citizen."[3]"
pulled with citations from Wikipedia. Yes, Wikipedia can be a poor factual resource, but that's the reason for the citations
Andy, I am 71 years old and if you reach 71 your mind will be made up about a lot of things too There is a point the bs doesn't work because you have seen it too many times.Wow...how bout the word Irony...
'Cause one could argue , all while quoting many of your posts...that you have your mind made up about a whole lot of things...
Not to forget the whole repeating the same words over and over....
Andy
Sooo...I was right in using the word irony...got it.Andy, I am 71 years old and if you reach 71 your mind will be made up about a lot of things too There is a point the bs doesn't work because you have seen it too many times.
It's heck having a good memory and seeing the same talking points over and over but that seems to be what people want to read. it's against the rules to talk about anything else.
They say it takes reading something 28 times before it's set to memory for most people, it's why governments run their propaganda machines night and day ( did I just repeat myself?) oh God I am funny.
Point is Andy, we should keep looking at and debating truth so we as a society can advance.
did you miss the words, "with citations"? Follow the citation to the primary source. Read the primary source. tada!Wikipedia... OK.
Let's let you do it did the democrats create 114 and get it passed in Oregon, yes that's true or no that isn't?who gets to decide what the truth is?
In your mind I guess you are right... in my mind who was talking about an iron.Sooo...I was right in using the word irony...got it.
Andy
Anytime anyone cites Wikipedia in this forum they will hit a brick wall. Legit citations be damned...did you miss the words, "with citations"? Follow the citation to the primary source. Read the primary source. tada!
Well I'll just go with you saying I am right.In your mind I guess you are right... in my mind who was talking about an iron.
Hey, I'm not clicking on that shet.Anytime anyone cites Wikipedia in this forum they will hit a brick wall. Legit citations be damned...
Then I will move on too with one last thought for you, an open mind will fall for anything. AdiosWell I'll just go with you saying I am right.
In any event...
I won't discuss this with you any longer and clog up the thread with our witty back and forth.
Any further comments from you in this thread on this matter will be ignored.
Andy
lol, this wins the internet for the day.an open mind will fall for anything
The whole thing can be summarized with the conclusion: "an open mind will fall for anything".Darn , I missed the fight. And the popcorn just got done.
The trouble with that statement is....The whole thing can be summarized with the conclusion: "an open mind will fall for anything".
Agree. My sarcasm might not have been that obvious.The trouble with that statement is....
A closed mind never lets in any light to see what is there and if it is worth holding on to.
Whereas a open mind...will let in the light so you can see if what you hold as true is indeed so.
However a balance is needed so as to not lose what one holds dear and true...and not to be lured astray with something that will undermine you and what is important to you.
Andy
Ahhh....or I simply could have been oblivious to the obvious...Agree. My sarcasm might not have been that obvious.
thats what you get for having an open mind....Ahhh....or I simply could have been oblivious to the obvious...
Andy