Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 5,641
- Reactions
- 12,047
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My answer is a resounding HELL NO!Monsignor Ronald Knox lamented the fact that he lived in an age in which all were taught how to read, but no one how to think. This was in 1927, 90 years ago.
View attachment 525045
Speaking of the legislature,.....here are the prefiled bills for the next session.
Prefiled Bills
~Whitney
Speaking of the legislature,.....here are the prefiled bills for the next session.
Prefiled Bills
~Whitney
My answer is a resounding HELL NO!
Look at what's going on in South Africa right now.
Exactly--Create a crisis then the and the sheeple will bleat "Save us!, allowing the government can enact whatever draconian laws they want.It is demonstrable that crime has increased with each new gun control statute. So, what then, is their aim? Increased crime? More victims?
How 'bout this? A law that say this: Any legislator who votes for a law that is later found to be unconstitutional will pay the court costs of the state AND the plaintiff(s), with their own money. That way taxpayers aren't burdened by their malfeasance.We need to enact a statute which punishes "Malicious legislation" since the antis are routinely overturned. Since poorly written or intended law leads to Malicious Prosecution, this would be a preventative measure.
I don't agree much with progressive rock group Green Day, but they nailed it when they sang; "Don't want to be an American idiot, One nation controlled by the media..."Exactly--Create a crisis then the and the sheeple will bleat "Save us!, allowing the government can enact whatever draconian laws they want.
"Did knowingly and with malice aforethought, draft and support legislation which was patently and clearly in violation of the United States Constitution and/or United States Supreme Court case law. Those found to be in violation will, in addition to criminal and civil sanctions, be subject to automatic recall."How 'bout this? A law that say this: Any legislator who votes for a law that is later found to be unconstitutional will pay the court costs of the state AND the plaintiff(s), with their own money. That way taxpayers aren't burdened by their malfeasance. After all, they take an oath to uphold the Constitution, they should pay for breaking that oath.
Look at what's going on in South Africa right now.
What grass-roots pro-gun lobby even exists in Washington? I'm not aware of any such organizations that are comparable to OFF or VCDL in Virginia. There is CCRKBA and SAF in Bellevue, but they can't be described as grass roots -- they are national organizations.
They are true ideologues.What I'm wondering is why anti-freedom groups are even bothering with asking legislature to pass more laws when they have a proven track record of success in getting the public to vote to eliminate in favor of their initiatives. Is it that they want to save a few million dollars in initiative costs on behalf of billionaires?
You don't even have to go that far, look at what NY is proposing...turning over social media Passwords to the state police to get a gun license...getting very Orwellian here.... all in the name of...you guessed it...safety.
Well heck, why not a key to your house and the combo to your safe too...you know...to be safe.
"Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"
Starting at 3:00 here:
Boss