- Messages
- 2,515
- Reactions
- 1,495
I wish I was surprised.I was surprised to hear it was only one count of 1st degree assault.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish I was surprised.I was surprised to hear it was only one count of 1st degree assault.
That's certainly a possibility. I'm not quite there on condemning them as awful. Looking at the past through today's lens isn't fair in my opinion.I don't think it is an age as much as a time. I think the world conformed better to certain people's prejudices for most of their lives, and now they are getting uncomfortable or confused having to deal with the fact that their awfulness is no longer going to be tolerated.
I'm not condemning everyone of a certain generation. I'm saying that bullies used to have more of a free hand at one time, if they were the right kind of people. And they are no longer a special class of citizen that gets a blind eye turned on them and are put out by that change.That's certainly a possibility. I'm not quite there on condemning them as awful. Looking at the past through today's lens isn't fair in my opinion.
Another possibility is they are confused as to why things that didn't used to be tolerated, are tolerated now to a much greater degree - vandalism, theft, assault, etc. (I'm not that old yet, but my pet peeve is "felon in possession". While grinding honest people with more and more gun control, "felon in possession" doesn't garner much interest from the powers that be. Night after night on the news you see someone charged with this and released almost immediately.)
Another is dementia.
Another is maybe the guy lost his wife and most of his friends are buried, so he walks around with IDGAF syndrome. When my grandfather passed the 80-year mark, he always followed any mention of his friends with the statement "of course he's dead now".
Talking with my mom and other relatives from the 80+ group, there is definitely a sense of missing the world the way it used to be. Some don't fear death much as they don't really want to be around with where things seem to be headed. I don't think there has ever been a larger gap between the lack of respect younger people have for the older generations and the lack of respect the older generations have for the younger people. Civility is dead. How many social media posts do you see where the older folks are crushing the younger for "participation trophies" or needing to have their college loans paid by taxpayers? And the flip side, younger people making comments like: "Yeah, can't wait until you all die and we'll be running the country." Unfortunately, I don't see it getting better any time soon.
It's like I struck a nerve somehow. That was not my intent. I'm largely in agreement with you. If you got the idea that my "possible explanations" were an excuse for what the old guy did, that's not the case at all. I hope he has some serious repercussions for his actions (like Travis McMichael). Unfortunately, as you and others have pointed out, that's not likely to be the case. As for vandals and shoplifters, I don't want them shot, but I would at least like to see them fined or jailed instead of ignored. I really don't see where I advocated tolerating violence or vigilantism, because I don't.I'm not condemning everyone of a certain generation. I'm saying that bullies used to have more of a free hand at one time, if they were the right kind of people. And they are no longer a special class of citizen that gets a blind eye turned on them and are put out by that change.
I don't care if you don't like vandals or shoplifters. You can take pictures of them, record their license plate number, confront them verbally, etc. I do not understand talking about tolerating violence from people that supposedly miss "civility". Violence is the least civil behavior there is. The reason we have laws against vigilantism is because they frequently get it wrong. And, just as frequently, they 'enforce' things that are not against the law in the first place.
As gun owners we are all big on the concept of self defense. As law abiding people we are big on the enforcement of law. But those two have almost zero to do with each other, yet we frequently see news items about people that grossly confuse them. This guy is just another Travis McMichael.
Your entire post is spot on but this part I can certainly identify with.Another possibility is they are confused as to why things that didn't used to be tolerated, are tolerated now to a much greater degree - vandalism, theft, assault, etc.
Looking back on this comment. Was the 40-year-old a minority? It wasn't mentioned in the story. I'm not understanding how a man of 70 pulling a gun on a man of 40 has to do with bullying. It's usually the other way around, particularly without the gun.I'm saying that bullies used to have more of a free hand at one time, if they were the right kind of people. And they are no longer a special class of citizen that gets a blind eye turned on them and are put out by that change.
I'm not reacting to you personally, just some of the ideas that seem embedded in your post and much of what is posted on this forum. You said exactly what many people are thinking.It's like I struck a nerve somehow. That was not my intent. I'm largely in agreement with you. If you got the idea that my "possible explanations" were an excuse for what the old guy did, that's not the case at all. I hope he has some serious repercussions for his actions (like Travis McMichael). Unfortunately, as you and others have pointed out, that's not likely to be the case. As for vandals and shoplifters, I don't want them shot, but I would at least like to see them fined or jailed instead of ignored. I really don't see where I advocated tolerating violence or vigilantism, because I don't.
This isn't the first time I've gotten an unexpected negative reaction to a post. It's possible I meander a bit too much.
The old guys attitude speaks of someone who believes that he has some authority that has neither been earned or given, but which is his to act on even with violence. Doesn't matter who he's bullying - probably some of his "friends" know exactly what it's like to cross him.Looking back on this comment. Was the 40-year-old a minority? It wasn't mentioned in the story. I'm not understanding how a man of 70 pulling a gun on a man of 40 has to do with bullying. It's usually the other way around, particularly without the gun.
I think the incident recently near Bellingham WA. where a person shot at a neighbor and then shot the two responding law enforcement officers with a shotgun involved a person of a similar age... While I think these types of incident occur amongst any age group, there is a number of older Americans who make these type of threats and then follow through.I'm wondering if there is a 'common thread' with men in this age category and irrational, violent behavior.
I think the incident recently near Bellingham WA. where a person shot at a neighbor and then shot the two responding law enforcement officers with a shotgun involved a person of a similar age... While I think these types of incident occur amongst any age group, there is a number of older Americans who make these type of threats and then follow through.
Yea, and if this starts to become epidemic whats next? Anti's pushing for age limits for gun ownership ?While I think these types of incident occur amongst any age group, there is a number of older Americans who make these type of threats and then follow through.
More likely would be licenses for CC - oh wait, we have those. Maybe with a multiple choice test?Yea, and if this starts to become epidemic whats next? Anti's pushing for age limits for gun ownership ?
How many people are shot in Chitown daily? How many of those shooters are "old"? If we want to see "epidemic" I would say Chitown is a perfect example of it and "what they will do".Yea, and if this starts to become epidemic whats next? Anti's pushing for age limits for gun ownership ?
Very insightful, @RVTECH . Yes. Men or women. Its just that its more of a social problem when it affects men. Alzheimer's and other forms of senile dementia destroy sections of the brain. If brain damage destroys the wrong section the person can become aggressive and violent, even though they were never like that when younger. Destruction of areas of brain that inhibit sexuality can cause what used to be an appropriately acting man to start propositioning everyone or even grabbing and trying to force sex on everyone. Bigger nursing homes usually have a section where all the caregivers are big strong men with skill in restraining such people without hurting them.I'm wondering if there is a 'common thread' with men in this age category and irrational, violent behavior.