JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
I saw a clip of the opening remarks of her trial, and that prosecutor knows as much about guns as I do about doctoral-level Calculus. It was extremely painful to watch.
For future reference, all questions requiring doctoral-level Calculus shall be forwarded to @Jade Falcon. This website cannot be matched for resources in its Membership.
 
Her only job was to be responsible for the firearms on the set.
And from what I read she was "trumped" by the director and Baldwin in different ways. First, she didn't have her hands on the gun before it went to Baldwin. Second, Baldwin didn't check anything for himself.
That doesn't answer every question about this shooting, but to lay the blame solely on her shoulders is absolutely wrong.
Baldwin was the one that pulled the trigger and lied about it. Baldwin aimed the gun at a person, which he shouldn't have.
The director handed him a gun and claimed it was cold, but we all know differently.
 
And this last page of discussion is exactly why I was worried that trying Baldwin in his capacity as an actor (withe zero responsibility or accountability) would get him off. He needed (needs) to be tried in his capacity as a responsible managing party, a producer, who was willfully and knowingly negligent in those duties. Try him that way and the function of the gun is irrelevant; he ran a set in such a way that it lead to someone dying by preventable and forewarned means, case closed. The prosecution seems to be as fixated on "the 4 rules" and "the function of the firearm" as some in this forum are, and Baldwin will likely walk because of it.
 
And from what I read she was "trumped" by the director and Baldwin in different ways. First, she didn't have her hands on the gun before it went to Baldwin. Second, Baldwin didn't check anything for himself.
That doesn't answer every question about this shooting, but to lay the blame solely on her shoulders is absolutely wrong.
Baldwin was the one that pulled the trigger and lied about it. Baldwin aimed the gun at a person, which he shouldn't have.
The director handed him a gun and claimed it was cold, but we all know differently.
I don't think anyone is trying to blame her solely. I know I'm not. I think they're both guilty as hell.
 
So she put the live rounds in the gun instead of blanks?
Maybe she lacks proper Fanny pack organization. :s0112: Whole things was a giant clusterfudge. Treating guns as toys and no respect for them or what they can do, from top of the food chain (Baldwin) through the middle (assistant director), to the bottom (armorer and whoever was shooting them for target practice then putting them back in the mix).
 
I doubt there has bever been a movie made that didn't have cocaine and marijuana on the set.
I'd grant you that. I KNOW there has never been a movie made without alcohol on the set. Somehow illegal intoxicants acquire greater potency and danger (and greater fanfare when things go south), by a process unknown to us and absorbed through legislation. Alcohol enjoys less attention and less responsibility by being legal. It often goes unmentioned (as it did here for a bit). All while statistics graphically show its clear and present level of danger and damage (even when compared to that of the illegal substances).
 
Coked out armorer had live rounds everywhere. In several actors bandoliers, in the gun, in the box of dummy rounds. Handed off bag of coke before cops interviewed her.


Hiring a drugged out, inexperienced, failed porn actor of low intelligence for a job requiring professionalism and attention to detail. How could it possibly go wrong? :(:eek:
 
Last Edited:
Coked out armorer had live rounds everywhere. In several actors bandoliers, in the gun, in the box of dummy rounds. Handed off bag of coke before cops interviewed her.


Hiring a drugged out, inexperienced, failed porn actor of low intelligence for a job requiring professionalism and attention to detail. How could it possibly go wrong? :(:eek:
Any links to any of her films?
 
Coked out armorer had live rounds everywhere. In several actors bandoliers, in the gun, in the box of dummy rounds. Handed off bag of coke before cops interviewed her.


Hiring a drugged out, inexperienced, failed porn actor of low intelligence for a job requiring professionalism and attention to detail. How could it possibly go wrong? :(:eek:
I'm not sure this is significant, but several of the loaded rounds in the pictures have silver primers in them and mismatched and tarnished cases. That would suggest rather strongly that they are reloads.
 

Upcoming Events

Teen Rifle 1 Class
Springfield, OR
Kids Firearm Safety 2 Class
Springfield, OR
Arms Collectors of Southwest Washington (ACSWW) gun show
Battle Ground, WA

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top