- Messages
- 2,159
- Reactions
- 3,410
Yeah, California's gun control laws are so complicated and there is such a labyrinth of twisted laws and regulations to circumvent the 2nd Amendment it does pose some interesting questions. I would assume that if the judge ruled it is an infringement on the 2nd Amendment for California to ban high capacity detachable magazines (which this case involved and he refers to as "arms"), it would probably be just as much of an infringement to ban the guns that accept these detachable magazines without "CA-friendly" modification. It's like saying owning a candle to light your room is a constitutional right, but you can only own a lighter or matches to light the candle, not the candle itself.