Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 20,338
- Reactions
- 77,129
And, they can always invoke "Admiralty law" to shore up there position!There is a lawyer over on reddit who has followed the case and broke down the round about way they cherry picked cases, including Old English law prior to the constitution, to come to the conclusion that the second does not cover concealed carry. The majority of the judges are appointed by Clinton.
I dont see the point of arguing these cases. There is really no need to even have human judges anymore since they are all corrupt and decide cases based on party requirements. Simply replace the judge with a big letter R or D and count them up
This case probably wont go to the supreme court either since there is a chance of having a liberal majority and since cases are not decided based on law or logic anymore, just party affiliation, there is no hope of decision based in reality.