- Messages
- 214
- Reactions
- 550
i'd say foot pursuit is out of the question due to thigh chafing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whole lotta "tea cupping" goin' on...Photos from an IRS recruiting program - source Representative Tom Massie.
View attachment 1259804
View attachment 1259805
View attachment 1259807
Short answer: For reasond that have nothing to do with an unpassed AWB.Why is the IRS hiring so many agents and posting job descriptions that include the requirement that the agents be willing to use lethal force and be armed?
What the IRS needs, in terms of staff, is better lawyers to go after the big time taxpayers who they are afraid to confront because they can afford the best tax lawyers and accountants.The IRS is grossly understaffed and the new tax law is only going to produce the revenue it should if it's enforced.
They are not hiring Accountants or haven't you figured that out yet.Yeah. And no one has dissolved Congress... yet!
I'm just always a little weirded out by how people can make a conspiracy out of nothing. If the govt does come after your guns, it isn't going to be by sending accountants out to do it. Having yet another armed LE agency doesn't change the danger either way - someone in charge has to give the order. IRS agents don't have some sort of arcane gun-sniffing power that the ATF does not.
The new enforcement includes expanded audits for incomes over $400k. That requires more agents, regardless of whether you or I think that's a good methodology.What the IRS needs, in terms of staff, is better lawyers to go after the big time taxpayers who they are afraid to confront because they can afford the best tax lawyers and accountants.
I really doubt that knocking on the doors (or an accountant/auditor going over their tax return) of someone who forgot to include the $150 in interest they got paid on the checking account balance, is going to result in much revenue, especially when you take into account (pun intended) the cost of the staff required to do that.
Just guessing, but I would not be surprised that most tax cheats are either small time cheats who deal in cash, or big time cheats with hidden offshore bank accounts.
Why is that a good thing? We tax payers aren't asking for it and clearly tax money could be better spent elsewhere.The new enforcement includes expanded audits for incomes over $400k. That requires more agents, regardless of whether you or I think that's a good methodology.
They are hiring all sorts of people. The listings are public - go look at them.They are not hiring Accountants or haven't you figured that out yet.
Why are you asking me? Did I say it was good? Nope.Why is that a good thing? We tax payers aren't asking for it and clearly tax money could be better spent elsewhere.
Of all things government tells us to fear, suburbanites making $400k never makes the list.
How many agents are they hiring, and who gave you that information? Will they be run out of a DC pizza parlor?Why is the IRS hiring so many agents and posting job descriptions that include the requirement that the agents be willing to use lethal force and be armed?
Because there is always overreach with these agencies. The IRS will simply call the confiscation "Asset forfeiture ".How do new rules on lowers affect an agency that collects income tax, not sales or property tax?
from that answer i can see you have not. your still asleep.They are hiring all sorts of people. The listings are public - go look at them.
The armed part of the IRS is currently 2100 agents.
Which goes back to my 1st posting in this thread. Why does the IRS need any armed agents? Why can't t they send FBI or US Marshall's to get "dangerous " tax scofflaws? Why aren't they using the funding to hire CPAs or enrolled agents? People who have some experience and understanding of tax law. I get that they need secretaries and clerical types. I just don't see why the IRS needs gunhands.They are hiring all sorts of people. The listings are public - go look at them.
The armed part of the IRS is currently 2100 agents.
They don't.Which goes back to my 1st posting in this thread. Why does the IRS need any armed agents? Why can't t they send FBI or US Marshall's to get "dangerous " tax scofflaws? Why aren't they using the funding to hire CPAs or enrolled agents? People who have some experience and understanding of tax law. I get that they need secretaries and clerical types. I just don't see why the IRS needs gunhands.
No, I'm just not a conspiracy theorist that believes everything Alex Jones has to say.from that answer i can see you have not. your still asleep.
So, no connection. Just a random occurance.Because there is always overreach with these agencies. The IRS will simply call the confiscation "Asset forfeiture ".
Because the IRS investigates and arrests certain types of financial fraud. It's on the IRS website if you want to learn from a real source.Which goes back to my 1st posting in this thread. Why does the IRS need any armed agents? Why can't t they send FBI or US Marshall's to get "dangerous " tax scofflaws? Why aren't they using the funding to hire CPAs or enrolled agents? People who have some experience and understanding of tax law. I get that they need secretaries and clerical types. I just don't see why the IRS needs gunhands.