- Messages
- 18,744
- Reactions
- 45,465
You can not train a POS into decency.Wouldn't the responsibility fall on the trainers to bring them up to snuff?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can not train a POS into decency.Wouldn't the responsibility fall on the trainers to bring them up to snuff?
Sure, it's just human nature to slack if there's no consequence to doing so (see socialism/communism).Lowering standards for new employees usually results in lower standards for existing employees. Why should you do your job thoroughly and with competence when others are allowed to lag?
So now we have false dichotomies to contend with?Don't worry, more proof is coming. One needs to look no further than the police chief, but feel free to defend "liberal hiring practices"
So you dismiss them, which is also the trainers responsibilityYou can not train a POS into decency.
Because it's a red herring, the reduction in requirements was:I dont see how 40% is acceptable or how lowering hiring standards did not contribute to this situation.
I might add that lowering the hiring standards also would unintentionally lower the training standards.
Not quite. The IG post stated that the 5 were hired outside the department's usual hiring process. They did not go through the usual TESTING process. This appears to be unrelated to the relaxation of the department's educational requirements reported in the Fox article, if the IG post can be believed. Details.No, 40% of candidates hired as underperformers is not acceptable, but that's not what the IG article was inferring.
It clearly inferred that all of them were diversity hires, which was being entirely disengenuous.
lost me, I never said that.Please explain to me how the actual reduction in requirements immediately makes them untrainable "POS" ?
I've come to an unspoken agreement with my employer; If you're going to pay me as little as possible, I'm going to do as little as possible.I've definitely had my professional standards lowered by constant turnover of new hires in my workplace. Not that my personal experience has any bearing on this situation. Merely one man's ability to understand how an industry in a rapid state of decline comes about.
Yeah, my bad. Didn't mean to have that be a direct question to you, I was really just throwing it out there to anyone that might have an opinion on the issuelost me, I never said that.
All Im saying is that the lowering of standards will yield lower results.
They have a narrative or script and they stick to it JMOI doubt that, this is not a training issue, it is a personnel issue. These five never should have been cops, they were thugs being thugs
Thanks. I haven't seen that. That...is...awesome...Covers aren't everyone's taste, but this is one of my favorites
Once again memories are amazingly short. Not sure where the idea that they lowed standards in 2018 came from. They may have lowed them yet again in 2018 but may forces were lowing them LONG before that. "Woke" did not suddenly start in 2018. This is the kind of thing people who want to ignore fact will use like stats. Don't want something to be true? Just find stat's to make it no longer true. Problem is of course facts are still facts. All 5 of those guys slipped through for a reason. Now the tax payers and the rest of the Cops there are going to pay dearly for this little screw up. Many who want to pretend this was a fluke? They can find all kinds of stats to tell them what they want to believe.Don't worry, more proof is coming. One needs to look no further than the police chief, but feel free to defend "liberal hiring practices"
Shockingly enough from a news report (several in fact) that specifically states that they did:Not sure where the idea that they lowed standards in 2018 came from.
Quote from a worker in the USSR:I've come to an unspoken agreement with my employer; If you're going to pay me as little as possible, I'm going to do as little as possible.
Really too bad we don't have a name for this kind of behavior . . .
You mean it's not white supremacy?Really too bad we don't have a name for this kind of behavior . . .