Bronze Lifetime
- Messages
- 11,357
- Reactions
- 26,026
Transitive verb, the action usually involves the tongue or donkus of the person performing the puckering.Puckering... verb or adjective?
Joe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Transitive verb, the action usually involves the tongue or donkus of the person performing the puckering.Puckering... verb or adjective?
Joe
I'm pretty sure those days are long past for any brass cased 9mm.I am still seeing an ammo shortage. I can't find any 9mm for less than $10 a box.
What is short supply then? What if demand doubled again and supply halved, and the price goes up to $100 for a box of generic 9mm?Ammo is not in short supply.
Ammo at reasonable retail prices is in short supply.
If you are willing to bend over, and bite your pillow, go to the various auction sites.
You will find the product, but not the price, you seek.
Shortage for most people means that the product is not available at a price I want it to be sold at. I think most of that ilk, also, flunked college 101 economics class.What is short supply then? What if demand doubled again and supply halved, and the price goes up to $100 for a box of generic 9mm?
It's still readily available for those who can pay it; still no shortage?
The reality is that if demand outstrips supply to where prices outrun normal market forces, it's a very real shortage. It doesn't have to be unavailable at any price to be a shortage.
No offense intended, and I don't mean to be contrary; I just scratch my head sometimes whenever I hear someone say "There is no shortage." I think we must have very different understandings of just what defines a shortage.
I want 30¢ per gallon gas, can't find any anywhere, all the gas stations want $5 per gallon - there seems to be a shortgage?I'd like to buy a new car for $100; there seems to be a shortage of quality automobiles in my price range.
With every panic many ask why "someone" does not just build a new factory. Price being very high they say now is the time. What they don't see is how long it takes to pay for the outlay. There is a LOT of savvy bushiness people with TONS of cash. Always looking for some way to make the cash grow. There is a reason the ones smart enough to have that cash know better than to slap up a factory making something in a panic shortage. They could certainly do this. Double or triple the output. Then what happens is just like the way it was before this panic hit. Shelves are full, no one wants the stuff, factory has to shut down part of the operation and lay off workers.Ammo pricing vs. supply is a classic economics 101 lesson on supply and demand.
We need more manufacturing capacity and thus far, no one has been willing to pony up enough capital to make that happen. And with the almost one billion rounds that were imported from Russia each year now missing from the equation, the pricing side of supply and demand will be a challenge to buyers.
Or dairy farmers. When I was growing up on the farm, it was always that way. The price of milk would be high, and the industry publications would all proclaim that this was going to be "the new normal" for the foreseeable future. Good times ahead!Ask Christmas Tree growers about boom and bust cycles.
Or pretty much many farmers - one year you do real well because your crop did well, there was demand for it, and prices were profitable because supply was reasonable or even low. The next year, all your neighbors planted the same crop, their crops did real well, and there is a glut in the market of that crop, so everybody barely makes a profit, or losses $ because the prices are so low.Or dairy farmers. When I was growing up on the farm, it was always that way. The price of milk would be high, and the industry publications would all proclaim that this was going to be "the new normal" for the foreseeable future. Good times ahead!
All the farmers would add cows to their milking herds. Within short order, supply would increase significantly, lowering prices to where farmers where going broke. When enough of them went under, supply declined and prices went up, starting the cycle all over again.
I understand completely. I know more about farming and logging than I need to anymore.Or pretty much many farmers - one year you do real well because your crop did well, there was demand for it, and prices were profitable because supply was reasonable or even low. The next year, all your neighbors planted the same crop, their crops did real well, and there is a glut in the market of that crop, so everybody barely makes a profit, or losses $ because the prices are so low.
For me, an intermittent tree farmer, I can (or can't anymore) afford to wait years, even decades, for a good market for my timber (in fact, I have to). But when there is that good market, then many of the other tree farms with mature(ish) trees, are logging too - that might or might not drive the price down - depends on how many have mature(ish) trees when the market demand is high (sometimes happens when the supply is low). I was lucky to own the property just at the right time when the trees were mature, marketable and the market price hit a high ($800/mbf for fir, 50-100% for cedar) - pole trees (straight, 6"-10" diameter for at lesat 40', few knots/limbs, not excessive taper) went for as much as $1000-$1200 mbf vs. dimensional lumber at $400-$800 mbf - that surprised me, but now it makes sense; the market demand, and much less processing - they only need to be cut to length and maybe treated, whereas dimensional lumber needs to be cut to dimensions, cured and possibly treated.
Plus, it takes at least 30-40 years for your crop to grow (if it is conifers for dimensional lumber in the PNW) - maybe more or less for trees to be used telephone poles or other poles/posts/etc. Interestingly (sadly IMO), most mills in the PNW can no longer handle large trees (beyond a certain diameter), so if you have a 6' diameter conifer, it has to be shipped farther away to a mill that can still handle that large of a tree.
No more logging on my land - I had my second and last shot at tree farming in 2018 - clear cut the back ten acres, and I don't want to thin the rest any more than I already have. It will be at least 40 years before the replant is loggable and I won't be around for that.
Most of the forest on the property I own was at least 60-80 years old when I had it logged, some of it 120+ years old.
Cedars are not really mature until about 80 years old, which is probably why the cedars on my property were left alone during the clear cut about 60-80 years ago. Some of the stumps, mostly cedar, were 5-6' across - one right by my house took the better part of a day to remove with a saw and a dozer - the outer 2' were rotten, but the inside was still solid.
I remember when I worked in logging for a short time (as a choker setter), we used to have/see "one log loads" on the trucks - i.e., logs so large and heavy, that the truck could only handle one log - that would be a log that was maybe 10-12' in diameter. Even then (50 years ago), that was rather unusual - before my time (my father's time and my grandfather's time - my maternal grandfather was a sawyer in a logging camp back in the steam powered days), it was not at all unusual - many logs were larger in diameter than a tall man. Not many of those giants in the PNW US anymore - except Alaska (and BC which of course is not the USA).
I kind of felt the same way about the family farm, especially since I drove by it every day going to work for ten years. Lots of good memories on that farm, but my grandparents have gone and now almost everybody in my dad's generation is gone; one uncle left, other uncle died a month ago, just my brothers and I who grew up on the farm - more or less.I understand completely. I know more about farming and logging than I need to anymore.
There was a beautiful piece of family property here in the PNW that I loved, dreamed about living on again some day. I helped my dad log and replant parts of it way back when. There was still a fair amount of mature timber on it, and what we replanted 30 years ago is growing nicely. My dad had said for years that it would probably be my inheritance some day.
Immediately after he passed away year before last, she sold it. She didn't need the money. Part of her reasoning was that she hates Oregon and doesn't want us to live here, and selling the land would break the connection. I'd known every inch of that land since I was old enough to walk and roam the woods, so it hurt pretty bad to see it go. It was hers though, to do with as she pleased. She doesn't owe me anything so I can't really complain.