- Messages
- 218
- Reactions
- 177
Ammo and accessories yes. Guns no.Then you have a paper trail.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ammo and accessories yes. Guns no.Then you have a paper trail.
Ammo and accessories yes. Guns no.
Yes I own several, all bought and or traded for before I-594. (What ever paper trail that is left for guns that I purchased prior to I-594 have been sold traded or lost) again before I-594.Maybe but I'm pretty sure they can figure it out. If your buying ammo you own a gun
Yes I own several, all bought and or traded for before I-594. (What ever paper trail that is left for guns that I purchased prior to I-594 have been sold traded or lost) again before I-594.
Well I see a couple solutions to the problems...1. put state districts/counties on an electoral system just like how the president is elected. Don't let a few metro cities determine the law of the land for the other 95% of the state that doesn't share the same views as them and happens to live in rural areas verses metropolis type areas.
what works for a densely populated city like Seattle doesn't work for a rural area where we live on acreage and police response times in an emergency are 15+ minutes minimum and far greater the more rural the area gets. apartment dwelling city folk don't understand why we need guns and trucks and why we should never vote our rights away as having a long gun in a city full of skyscrapers doesn't make sense to them as they know nothing else and don't care to.
But unfortunately for us they have all the voting power because they are densely populated and have the numbers. So to balance this out we just need to use an electoral system within the states to pass state wide measures. what they do in their own district is their own problem. but their views shouldn't be used to oppress the rest of the state.
View attachment 516218
look at the district races and you can see exactly where the populations in the "green" counties are that voted yes...cause it's not the entire county. majority of area in king county voted no, just seattle/bellevue area voted yes.
Not sure what you are saying. I believe the guns I still own prior to I-594 are still legal...or not? Local law enforcement knows I own guns as I and friends target shoot in my front yard.Or comments like this...
Siincerely,
Your Friendly Neighborhood LEO
Rereading my post I should also say that the (sold, bought or lost) part was just used to show that before I-594 there is no paper trail to show what I did and no I have not lost any firearms but I did do some trading and selling.Not sure what you are saying. I believe the guns I still own prior to I-594 are still legal...or not? Local law enforcement knows I own guns as I and friends target shoot in my front yard.
Rereading my post I should also say that the (sold, bought or lost) part was just used to show that before I-594 there is no paper trail to show what I did and no I have not lost any firearms but I did do some trading and selling.
I have a blog post with the highlights of what's in I-1639 here: Initiative 1639 – What You Need to Know
So heres the way it is in washington
An AR receiver can be built into a long gun or hand gun
If it is stamped pistol then pistol it is
Semantics vs legal discussion...No you are wrong, a receiver is a receiver no matter what is stamped on it
I ate an elephant once. not really
Thank you for your write up on I-1639. Regarding the enhanced background checks and training. If Handguns and Semiautomatics are passed down to local law enforcement level, does this mean concealed pistol licensees will be required to wait extended periods of time (10 days etc) for local law enforcement to clear them as when handgun purchasers do not have a CPL? Regarding firearm safety courses, how will this be handled and what will be required? Please and thank you.
SAMMY!