Platinum Supporter
- Messages
- 871
- Reactions
- 1,987
The biggest difference is that the USA has the 2nd Amendment. With the Constitution being the Supreme Law of the Land, there is never any justification for restrictions on those rights protected by the Constitution.Funny you mentioned that. Sir, in spite of the snide way you did it. Here in UK, in order to get a Firearms Certificate, we DO have to have a thorough background check, and need two referees who have known us for at least two years to vouch for us, as well. AND six months attendance in a gun club. AND tutelage on every kind of firearm that we are allowed. AND tests of safety and knowledge of the law.
That way, we tend to have fewer loonies shooting the bejasus out of shopping malls, churches and dance halls on a weekly basis.
And if you think that the UK is going down the pan, gun-wise, just take a minute away from slamming the place, and take a look of the legal requirements in that other great shooting nation, the Federal Republic of Germany - even before you can even pick up a gun, let alone shoot it.
Because the UK DOES have background checks, instigated only after a massacre in Hungerford back in 1986, there have only been three more since then. I dare say that there have been three mass shooting this month in the USA, not that most folks pay them any attention any more.
Obviously the United Kingdom operates differently, which is why they had a much easier time enacting such sweeping gun ownership reforms.
Over here though, I have no envy of those laws, even if they have reduced the number of firearms related deaths. Just because somebody else has abused their rights, does not make it okay to take away those rights from others!
Again, different cultures, different governments, and different strokes for different folks!