Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is like the idiot driver who doesn't see you and almost plows into you. You honk at them to avoid having your front end taken off, and they get mad and flip you off...like it's all your fault.Yeah.
" F U pu$$y at the end " . Definitely didn't learn a thing.
After hearing that part I can almost say I would have enjoyed seeing him take a full mag and hit the ground with lifeless, gaping eyes staring skyward - but glad he didn't ONLY for the sake of the older fella...." F U pu$$y at the end " . Definitely didn't learn a thing.
Punks will often try a "prank" first, to see how you react. If one reacts with the credible possibility of force, they back down and hide behind "We wuz jokin, man, just messin wit ya!"Not really enough to go on by the video but if this happened during riots I think it would have changed the outcome.
Concealed carry stopped this from escalating from a prank to the idiot and his friend assaulting the old guy. In my opinion.
Nope.So instead of the 21 foot rule against a man with a knife, you have an unknown with a can of gas going to burn you up.
If you were on the jury and the concealed guy shot the idiot right away then would you convict him?
And just as phuq'n stoo-pit...The "prank" is about the same as pointing a fake gun at someone.
FIFY...Use of deadly forceisshould be judged through an objective lens and not a subjective lens.
Well that used to be the standard….. Obviously progressive DAs are f-cking it all up. Along with left leaning juries. The whole constitution and case law is being tossed out the window.FIFY...
We all know that the specific jurisdiction within which something like this incident occurs is often the key to objectivity... or the lack or it...