JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Sanctuary. What they all chanted in the book/movie, Logan's Run. They were happy as pie until they learned what Sanctuary was. Then it was too late. Once (hypothetically) those dirty assault weapons are gone. It's too late.
 
The left is always trying to groom another young candidate with Kennedy appeal. Packaging and identity are an important part of their strategy.
 
Who's right here? The author of the article below who claims:

or the reader in the comments section:



The article writer is correct. I think most gun owners have long been skeptical of the "we're not coming for your guns" line. I would guess that many non-gun owners believed it. But with Beto saying on stage in the debates that the goal is confiscation, even the non-gun owners (and weirdly, there are 2A supporters who don't own guns) are going to see the truth.

The commenter actually reinforces the confiscatory policy position by noting that it might not happen today, but 10 years down the road it could. Whenever Antis whine about how X piece of legislation is not a slippery slope and only an idiot would think so, the commenter actually shows that what they are shooting for, IS a slippery slope. The end of that slope is the end of private ownership of all firearms.
 
Then...…... there are the Dems (and anti-gun folks) who think that they are being "reasonable," by suggesting that the USA should be more like Australia. Rrrrreally?



Aloha, Mark

PS...….Not really Australia. But, remember that.....

Due to policies of civilian disarmament, the British people were stripped of their guns by their own government policies, arms needed to defend themselves against potential Nazi invasion.

Taken from: Throwback Thursday: Send A Gun to Defend a British Home

"When the enemy knocks....who ya gonna call?"

And, in the Pacific Theater....YES, Australia was also under the threat of invasion by Japan.
 
Last Edited:
I tend to believe that Beta's main reason for existence on the Dem stage is to muddy the waters and be a distraction. I also believe that the reason he continues to allow himself to be a useful idiot is because he loves the attention.

However, I'm starting to wonder...
When Kamela Harris said she would ban guns by EO, an unlikely voice of reason (Biden) informed her that she can't do that because, u know... Constitution.

She giggled her sizable badonk-a-donk off at the silly old white man and said, "Instead of saying we can't, let's say we CAN!"*.

Was she saying F The Constitution? Does she think we're electing a Queen? Or is she just regurgitating a line from Obama's campaign for a cheap applause break?

All of the above is my guess.

No matter, really. What I'm getting at is the fact that O'Rourke's forced compliance rhetoric is not at the extreme end of the Dems' respective platforms, it's right in line with the rest of them.

*A paraphrase... I don't have the verbatim quote in front of me. Plus she was a little slur-y w her words, sounded like she'd been hangin' w Snoop and the Dogg-house posse in the green room before the debate. Nothing Creepy Joe said was even remotely funny.
 
When they move the lines far enough to move me into the 'criminal' pool, I guess that is what they'll call me.

I haven't changed - They did!
My relatives in the Soviet Union became criminals when they secretly started practicing Judaism. That was considered by the Communist government to be a threat to the security and soveriegnty of the State and was effectively banned. All religious artifacts were confiscated and Rabbis and others who continued to practice the banned religion were imprisoned and sent to gulags (slave labor camps).

When the government decides without any constitutional decree what should be banned they tend to ban whatever is within their power to ban if it is consider a threat to their power.

It was illegal at one time for a Jew in Germany not to wear a yellow patch on his clothing. A crime.

By the way, Beto O'Rourke utterly hates Jews and even talked about declaring war on Israel and teaching "the Jews" a lesson with what he calls "their greed and warmongering" if he is elected president.

Bettohole is a real class act! First he will take my guns, then he will take my religion! Sound familiar? Kristallnacht 2020
 
what's crazy is that they're continuing to say that "no ones coming after your guns!" Still! even when they blatantly want to ban and confiscate the most popular rifle.
 
Everyone on that stage last night supports an Semi Auto Ban, magazine ban and confiscation. I dont know how anyone that owns a gun or has any understanding of history can support this. But.. many gun owners do:(

Biden wants AWB (semi auto ban), magazine ban, etc. Took 10 seconds to find this vid. Makes the following statement in the first minute.

" No rationale to own a military style weapon, an AR15"

"There is no threat to the 2A by telling people there are certain weapons they can not own"
 
I only wish that Pedo... ah, Beto was the one actually trying to "confiscate" these 'fully-semi auto' weapons...
20190325_163136.jpg
 
When mentally unbalanced socialist dictator wannabees speak: I just roll my eyes and laugh....
I roll my eyes too, but I remain seriously concerned with the huge number of dimwits who don't know idiotic, pandering drivel when they hear it, and think, "No more guns anywhere? That means no more crime. I'll vote for that!"
 
Last Edited:

Upcoming Events

Teen Rifle 1 Class
Springfield, OR
Kids Firearm Safety 2 Class
Springfield, OR
Redmond Gun Show
Redmond, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top