Silver Supporter
- Messages
- 10,199
- Reactions
- 17,549
Not a binaryAlthough for some reason Washington State seems to think binary triggers are bad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a binaryAlthough for some reason Washington State seems to think binary triggers are bad.
Whuh? WA banned binary triggers?Although for some reason Washington State seems to think binary triggers are bad.
Snuck into the new definition of "machine gun" during the last redo of gun laws by the idiots In Oly:Whuh? WA banned binary triggers?
Never underestimate the sheer strength of abject apathy and laziness. "I got mine, why should I care?"RANT
What bothers me is they say there is 100 million folks out there that own guns out of the 350 million folks in the US.
Out of that they say 75 million own more than one that totals up to the 400 million guns in civilian uses.
Then I see 3% stickers everywhere on rigs like they are bad asses. Three percent of 100 million would add up to 3 million folks of the 100-million-gun owners that say they are hard core gun owners.
Yet out of all the gun owners we cannot even hit 300,000 signatures on the Frame Receiver AFT changes and currently we can not even get 200,000 on the Arm Brace rule changes no wonder we cannot get ahead if we are not even willing to send a canned message provided by many organizations out there. I mean folks do not even need to come up with their own thoughts just fill in some blanks and hit send.
We deserve to lose all are rights if we can not even spend 5 minutes to send a canned message.
You may not like Arm Braces or agree with building your own guns but just doing nothing to me is telling them to please regulate me to death and take my rights away.
This is SAD, very SAD
If you sent a comment thank you, if not then why even own guns.
RANT OVER
I am confident an AR pistol will shoot accurately at 200yds with a good brace and technique. Infringment is not noise and static to me.Not too long ago, I was in a gun shop and the counter clerk there was talking up the CAA Micro Roni pistol stock. You take your Glock, M&P or whatever (that fits what they make) and insert it into the Micro stock. The clerk said, "Yeah, you can shoot your Glock accurately out to 200 yards with this." Well, maybe. BUT: If I'm gonna shoot out to 200 yards, I'm gonna want a real rifle in the first place. This is what I don't get about the entire wrist brace thing, EXCEPT maybe for disabled veterans who were the initial intended beneficiaries of this technology in the first place. If that wasn't just a gag to get a foot in the door.
Same comment as to AR's with wrist braces and SBR's. I fail to see the practical point of them. Accordingly, all the commotion about their legality and the niggling fine points of definition seem like a lot of unnecessary noise and static.
Couple things.BUT: If I'm gonna shoot out to 200 yards, I'm gonna want a real rifle in the first place. This is what I don't get about the entire wrist brace thing, EXCEPT maybe for disabled veterans who were the initial intended beneficiaries of this technology in the first place. If that wasn't just a gag to get a foot in the door.
Same comment as to AR's with wrist braces and SBR's. I fail to see the practical point of them. Accordingly, all the commotion about their legality and the niggling fine points of definition seem like a lot of unnecessary noise and static.
Arm braces may or may not be used as a way thru "loophole" in the law, just as the Shockwave/Tac-14/et. al. are. But they are allow by the law, as are binary triggers/etc., and as were bumpstocks.Not too long ago, I was in a gun shop and the counter clerk there was talking up the CAA Micro Roni pistol stock. You take your Glock, M&P or whatever (that fits what they make) and insert it into the Micro stock. The clerk said, "Yeah, you can shoot your Glock accurately out to 200 yards with this." Well, maybe. BUT: If I'm gonna shoot out to 200 yards, I'm gonna want a real rifle in the first place. This is what I don't get about the entire wrist brace thing, EXCEPT maybe for disabled veterans who were the initial intended beneficiaries of this technology in the first place. If that wasn't just a gag to get a foot in the door.
Same comment as to AR's with wrist braces and SBR's. I fail to see the practical point of them. Accordingly, all the commotion about their legality and the niggling fine points of definition seem like a lot of unnecessary noise and static.
They don't do a good job of either function. ATF is just looking for a way to justify their existence and their spending.I have never seen anyone use a pistol brace as brace, everyone l see using them shoulders it like a stock. Just sayin.
There was nothing to be infringed upon until these things came out of the woodwork as the latest fad.Infringment is not noise and static to me.
Unless you have very narrow corridors in your home (like maybe a mobile home, perhaps) a 16 in. bbl. and collapsible stock AR is already pretty handy.Urban/home defense, vehicle borne, concealed in backpacks
Yes.In Wash., we aren't allowed to carry loaded rifles in vehicles. I wonder if the SBR is a rifle for that purpose?
An SBR is, by definition, a rifle, and would be illegal to carry loaded in your vehicle, even with a CHP. However, the law (currently) allows an AR or AK-pattern rifle that does not have a telescoping stock to be carried in your vehicle loaded as it is (still) classified as a pistol. Essentially, with a valid CHP, you could carry this AR/AK pistol just as you would a regular handgun (for now).Also in Wash., our carry permits say, "Concealed Pistol Permit." I wonder how the SBR stacks up on that, anyone in Wash. know?
All the the more reason to support the braced or cheek rest AR pistol system. As pistols, they can absolutely be legally loaded and carried in vehicles.There was nothing to be infringed upon until these things came out of the woodwork as the latest fad.
I'm surprised some people here are willing to go for the SBR, pay the $200 tax, get their name on a list. Surprised because I also read people on NWFA discussing not wanting to be on government lists.
Unless you have very narrow corridors in your home (like maybe a mobile home, perhaps) a 16 in. bbl. and collapsible stock AR is already pretty handy.
In Wash., we aren't allowed to carry loaded rifles in vehicles. I wonder if the SBR is a rifle for that purpose? Also in Wash., our carry permits say, "Concealed Pistol Permit." I wonder how the SBR stacks up on that, anyone in Wash. know?