Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 13,095
- Reactions
- 46,636
Who didn't see this coming? Stolen elections have consequences…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Making them "woke" would radically change them…. It's worked for BLM/Antifa/Democrat party…The article states that you would have to radically change the firearm. Wouldn't a simple barrel swap to a 16 inch or greater barrel length fix the problem.
I am an old man and the infringement has gone on my entire life. You are right , they are not our friends.I am sure they will be worked in on the deal along with any semi auto guns not just ar guns.It is never just one thing package deal all or nothing they are no ones friend's. Keep the guns out of the hands of the enemy.
Guess that makes us enemies of the state….I am an old man and the infringement has gone on my entire life. You are right , they are not our friends.
Not as long as you have something they can steal.Guess that makes us enemies of the state….
You are incorrect or misinterpreting my point. There is a huge difference between the ATF changing a rule and Congress passing a law. GCA '34 and the Hughes Amendment were both passed by Congress - they weren't some arbitrary rule change at the whim of the ATF.They did the rule change with full autos, there was a time full autos had no tax.
Just saying they might do the same thing to semis that they did to full, stop all production and drive the prices up so the common man can't afford them.
Don't forget, the only way they even got the Hughes act passed was to make it a TAX instead of an outright ban, and even then, it went before the SCOTUS to supposedly insure it was "Constitutnal" before being passed! Many would argue that it was/is an illegal tax, as in passed with out a vote of the people, no taxation with out representation, and because the public at large had no idea what was happening, BAM, we got a new tax on a right! That it has stood is also a major issue, though one that nobody has tried to challenge as of yet!You are incorrect or misinterpreting my point. There is a huge difference between the ATF changing a rule and Congress passing a law. GCA '34 and the Hughes Amendment were both passed by Congress - they weren't some arbitrary rule change at the whim of the ATF.
My point is that adding AR's to the NFA list might be front and center in Chipman's wet dreams but it is outside of the scope of a simple rule change that the ATF would be permitted to make. Such a thing would have to be done through Congress, where it is unlikely to pass anyway. And, if passed, it would have to eventually be ruled on by the Supreme Court, as it would appear to contradict with Heller.
So...no, the ATF did not do a simple rule change regarding machine guns. This is an important distinction, especially considering the guy who is about to take the helm.
and if one were to grip that bipod, would it be considered an AOW at that point?
That's why I coat mine with broken glass.and if one were to grip that bipod, would it be considered an AOW at that point?
Very true indeed! I'm always amazed how uninformed several of my "gun" friends are at times to new laws. Shows how much effort they put into voting as well, lol.So a couple cube farmers at the ayeteeeff are sitting around stroking their oily buffer tubes 'feeling' as if 'they' have a higher moral authority over the lives and property of 'millions' of law abiding Americans....and most of those Americans will be completely oblivious to Agent Todd and Agent Karen's new mandate and unwittingly become instant felons. Sometimes I think social media gun sites like NWFA naturally assume most gun owners participate when in my experience, almost everyone outside such places have never heard or, or have time to get involved in firearms discussion forums.
Reminds me of 922r....,always a work around with the parts count with no record of anyone ever being convicted for having too many imported parts.At what point will we finally push back with the same level of unity, focus, veracity and intensity as those coming up with this corn-filled sewage? Figuring out how to follow this point system, debating the semantics of what is or isn't a pistol or accessory in common use, or pondering how they came up with their criteria to screw us over, is really a distraction that is dragging us down to their level. The fact is they are going to push, and push, and push until everyone who believes in Constitutional rights and freedoms is a felon. It doesn't matter what guns we own, what is on them, whether they are wood or plastic, or carry one round or a hundred and one rounds. While we fiddle, Rome is burning and they have a seemingly endless supply of torches and gasoline. We better wake up soon with something a little more useful than a water pistol and a no-smoking sign.
Friend we are on the same side so forgive if I don't speak and post the way you want. I post opinion from my understanding and really don't ever argue points of perfection. I do think if you look at registering millions of guns with the NFA and what a nightmare and folly it is then you may agree they won't do it. Its a fear tactic to say they will imho.You are incorrect or misinterpreting my point. There is a huge difference between the ATF changing a rule and Congress passing a law. GCA '34 and the Hughes Amendment were both passed by Congress - they weren't some arbitrary rule change at the whim of the ATF.
My point is that adding AR's to the NFA list might be front and center in Chipman's wet dreams but it is outside of the scope of a simple rule change that the ATF would be permitted to make. Such a thing would have to be done through Congress, where it is unlikely to pass anyway. And, if passed, it would have to eventually be ruled on by the Supreme Court, as it would appear to contradict with Heller.
So...no, the ATF did not do a simple rule change regarding machine guns. This is an important distinction, especially considering the guy who is about to take the helm.