Would you support a ban on semi-automatic weapons and ammunition?

[CAR]

H/// NO I may need them I never learned to speak chinese

 

[joken]

Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.



I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.



When I use to hunt, absolutely no one carried a semi-automatic rifle since this would result in mocking their marksmanship or competence with a firearm. The goal was always one shot and done.

Do you own an AR15? I suggest that you get rid of any semi-automatic weapons you own as an example of your own self-righteousness.

 

[Mikej]

Ummm this thread is weird

Yes it it is. It just won't be allowed to die. Poor thread, just keeps getting dug up again and again.

 

[Bobbygun]

I was kinda hoping my post (#2) would be "nuff said". And here we are page 35...

 

[sobo]

 

[bbbass]

 

[Xaevian]

 

[sobo]

Dakȟóta tribal wisdom states that when one discovers that one is riding a colloquial "dead horse", the preferred strategy is to dismount...

 

[Kruel J]

did you use the "small penis" argument for hunting with a semi auto? Who mocks anyone for the tool they want to use? how about you give up your single shot and hunt like a real man with your bare hands?

What is with people? 2 months ago everyone was celebrating civilian Ukrainians making Molotov's and giving teenage girls fully auto AK47's to fight the Russians and now everyone is back to "muskets" and "well regulated militias" and small penis nancy boys if your hunting rifle carries more than zero rounds at any time?

None of us killed those kids. None of us need to feel guilty for what everyone else does. Those police officers should be put in stocks and have rotten food thrown at them though.

I now feel like drilling a damn 3rd pin hole

Mic drop.

 

[titsonritz]

You think that's the only one? That's just the worst one.

<snip>

Not even close, the worse school massacre in US history took place on May 18, 1927; 95 years ago in Bath Township, Michigan resulting in 45 dead and 58 injured.
Bath School disaster

 

[titsonritz]

I'm not sure how responding to back in my day this wasn't a problem with the fact that it did in fact happen, it just didn't dominate the news cycle for a month while politicians tried to infringe on our rights is intellectually dishonest but, Ok Boomer.

See post above, the fact is it is nothing new.

 

[AK0perator47]

Kinda looks like they are related

 

[mhayd93]

Not even close, the worse school massacre in US history took place on May 18, 1927; 95 years ago in Bath Township, Michigan resulting in 45 dead and 58 injured.
Bath School disaster

But how is that possible when the killer didn't even use a "high-capacity" firearm??

 

[CLT65]

But how is that possible when the killer didn't even use a "high-capacity" firearm??

Fake news

 

[sobo]

View attachment 1263597View attachment 1263599

Kinda looks like they are related

Wait, wait, wait... The Bath School bomber and Philip Seymour Hoffman are related...???

 

[MTpockets]

Come on kids, Quit playing with your food.

Edit to Add: Months ago I messaged Scrubnut...I let him know that if he wanted to close the thread, he could request it from a Moderator.

 

[Will_White]

Not even close, the worse school massacre in US history took place on May 18, 1927; 95 years ago in Bath Township, Michigan resulting in 45 dead and 58 injured.
Bath School disaster

Indeed, I just chose the worst of the mid 1960s since that is when it was claimed these things didn't happen.

 

[jlynblackmore]

Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.



I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.

Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.



I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.



When I use to hunt, absolutely no one carried a semi-automatic rifle since this would result in mocking their marksmanship or competence with a firearm. The goal was always one shot and done.

Not only does what you say make no sense whatsoever and in no way has anything to do with a rational though, we are all dummer from reading it.

 

[Diamondback]

Ripley Time, @Moderators , nuke it from orbit.

 

[Andy54Hawken]

I am going to have to agree with Diamondack's post here.
This topic has been beaten to death...and racked over the coals.

Also there is this to consider :
Lots of less than excellent going on in this thread.
Attack the position taken , by the forum member...Not the forum member.

Thread is closed.
Andy