- Messages
- 201
- Reactions
- 326
I think that's why they made them biodegradable.I don't think there's any confusion on that one. It's so cheap, you chuck it in the bushes and get a new one instead of cleaning it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think that's why they made them biodegradable.I don't think there's any confusion on that one. It's so cheap, you chuck it in the bushes and get a new one instead of cleaning it.
I know Hi Points are popular because they're cheap and reliable... What stumps me is why that company hasn't made any effort to update the design or aesthetics of their products.
You answered your own question.I know Hi Points are popular because they're cheap and reliable... What stumps me is why that company hasn't made any effort to update the design or aesthetics of their products.
What, them printing "yeet cannon" on the slide wasnt aesthetic enough for you?I know Hi Points are popular because they're cheap and reliable... What stumps me is why that company hasn't made any effort to update the design or aesthetics of their products.
pfffttt... A lot of opinion but no facts. Having owned and used the FAL, Garand, M1A, and a few others, I can say that NEITHER is "unreliable" or "inferior". The rejection of the FAL had more to do with "Not made here" than being "scared". And it wasnt "boomers", BTW, it was our parents. Many of us DID like the M14 in RVN, where it was effective and hard-hitting, especially in the jungle. It just wasnt up to competition with the AK. The snafu regarding the intro of the M16- which got guys killed- did a lot to cement the reputation of the M14 in the minds of many who used it.The M14. It had the shortest service life of any American rifle, unreliable Garand style action, was only adopted because boomers of the time were scared of the FAL and couldn't accept that the rifle they used in WW2 was an inferior design.
Yet for some reason people still fawn over them and pay 2x what they should sell for
Lol I was just in the Philippines where the m200 is made and everyone I talked to said most of armscor products are seen as a cheap bubblegum option on the legal marketOne that made sense years ago but no longer does (yet I still see them praised as much as ever) is the Armscor M200 revolver. A decade or more ago, they were available as brand new (ie with warranty coverage) handgun, of non-pot-metal construction, in a viable defensive caliber, and all for under $200. Inflation has brought the prices up to more like $250, which is fine except these days there are many options that are equally good (in some cases far better) for even less money. For one example, something like a Girsan MC28 costs the same, with 3x the ammo capacity, better trigger, better build-quality, and the same size/weight. Live in a mag ban state? 10-rd mags are available, too. I just don't see much of a practical case for them anymore.
At first I thought it was just the p320 that stumped me….. then after I went and used the restroom and just had a thought rush into my head before flushing down my # 2. I just thought, wow I am actually stumped by everything Sig…. There I said it.
.those suppository guns
For the modern market you can find guns just as accurate if not more for cheaper with more modularity, see the AR10. But nostalgia and video game have kept the inferior design alive. Also they werent my parents they aint that oldpfffttt... A lot of opinion but no facts. Having owned and used both the Garand and the M1A, I can say that NEITHER is "unreliable" or "inferior". The rejection of the FAL had more to do with "Not made here" than being scared. And it wasnt "boomers", BTW, it was our parents. Many of us DID like the M14 in RVN, where it was effective and hard-hitting, especially in the jungle. It just wasnt up to competition with the AK. The snafu regarding the intro of the M16- which got guys killed- did a lot to cement the reputation of the M14 in the minds of many who used it.
The reason shooters pay beaucoup bucks for them is they are accurate and readily accessorized, and configured like a "traditional" rifle... The FAL, while the "Right Arm Of The Free World", not so much.
And this is kinda my point; these days if you can get better quality for the same price or less, why is anyone bothering with something like an M200 anymore?Lol I was just in the Philippines where the m200 is made and everyone I talked to said most of armscor products are seen as a cheap bubblegum option on the legal market
NGL I kind of want one but only because theyre the cheapest wheel gun that isnt a 22 and I have 0 use for a revolver so Im not going to spend s&w money on oneAnd this is kinda my point; these days if you can get better quality for the same price or less, why is anyone bothering with something like an M200 anymore?
im in that camp tooDon't own one huh? We might be the only two gun lovers that don't!
Make that four in that camp...im in that camp too
I have no glocks
Funny, I can say the same thing about my Glocks!My Kimbers all work flawlessly, doesn't know why all the hate!