- Messages
- 151
- Reactions
- 190
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Inslee may be exposed to damages for his excessive covid lockdowns, mask and vaccine mandates.IMHO.....it's one thing to play games in court making arguments.
But......it's certainly another thing........
If/when they are found guilty of TYRANNY.
In other words : They need to be held accountable (with an appropriate PUNISHMENT) for their TYRANNY.
Aloah, Mark
Baby steps. Getting an injunction for now goes a long way.IMHO.....it's one thing to play games in court making arguments.
But......it's certainly another thing........
If/when they are found guilty of TYRANNY.
In other words : They need to be held accountable (with an appropriate PUNISHMENT) for their TYRANNY.
Aloah, Mark
Wrong state, take a deep breath. Not EVERYTHING is about 114!Really? We are worried about the mag ban portion of the law? That's what we are arguing?
Let's be real if you're on this forum you probably have more mags than you'll ever need for the rest of your life, I know I do. I could use rifle and pistol mags for toilet paper for a year and still have enough to last me the rest of my life.
Why would we be fighting just the mag ban portion when the real issue we need to fight is HAVING A TRAINING COURSE TO BUY A SEMI AUTO, or maybe classifying anything that is not a bolt gun lever gun or pump gun a ASSAULT WEAPON! What about yearly random background checks to make sure you're still allowed to own a gun. What about agreeing to disclose medical records every time you purchase a firearm.
I'm not referring to 114, I'm referring to 1639. Dingus.Wrong state, take a deep breath. Not EVERYTHING is about 114!
This is regarding the WA mag ban.
Dingus? Piss off with that bubblegum.I'm not referring to 114, I'm referring to 1639. Dingus.
Calls it like I sees itDingus? Piss off with that bubblegum.
You're correct, sorry.
However, this is STILL about the mag ban. Different law. i1639 should go away, but that's not what THIS suit is about.
No, you're just an bubblegum.Calls it like I sees it
Not sure what swear word you used because it got filtered. But you're probably right. At the same time though, I do call it like I see it ha haNo, you're just an bubblegum.
Death by a thousand cut.. mag ban might not seem bad but they use the same method to get more passed later. If you can over turn you mag ban, you will be able to stop 1639. I am not up to speed on washington as oregon has its own going on but what other have said 1639 hasn't pass or gone to vote yet?I just don't see us getting anywhere fighting a mag ban that we already know (and Supreme Court knows) is unconstitutional. Why don't we get some people to really fight for 1639 to be ruled unconstitutional and maybe turn this state back to what it was. Idk about you but I haven't had any trouble finding magazines in washington since the mag ban, but I have however had to wait 10 business days to pick up a F*CKING 10/22
We are very worried about the mag limit law.Really? We are worried about the mag ban portion of the law? That's what we are arguing?
Let's be real if you're on this forum you probably have more mags than you'll ever need for the rest of your life, I know I do. I could use rifle and pistol mags for toilet paper for a year and still have enough to last me the rest of my life.
Why would we be fighting just the mag ban portion when the real issue we need to fight is HAVING A TRAINING COURSE TO BUY A SEMI AUTO, or maybe classifying anything that is not a bolt gun lever gun or pump gun a ASSAULT WEAPON! What about yearly random background checks to make sure you're still allowed to own a gun. What about agreeing to disclose medical records every time you purchase a firearm.