Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"They" would like to control everything that we do. Every thought, everything we can say in public or ponder in school... Complete access to every facet of our small businesses, our creditability, and our health care system. These people never met a form a permit or a tax they didn't like. And you cannot ignore any of it or face the consequences. But they say we are the "nazis"They are doing everything in the anti gun play book, put economic and political barriers to creep towards total ban/confiscation. And of course ram it through even if it doesn't stick too long from being struck down by the courts. Quite frankly, a sad state of affairs where we live in a state that's bent on shredding the 2A and willing to sue its own citizens for unconstitutional gun laws.
I only do that in days that end in "Y".Lol. Selling guns, boats and motorcycles is akin to eating oysters. Only do it in months without an "R".
Definitely, including making it so hard for ffls to stay in business wa is going to end up with 5 FFLs for the whole state would be my guess (eventually I mean). They think if they make it so hard to buy there will be less guns. Anything you see in Illinois, ca, or wa will be tried in wa imo.They are doing everything in the anti gun play book, put economic and political barriers to creep towards total ban/confiscation. And of course ram it through even if it doesn't stick too long from being struck down by the courts. Quite frankly, a sad state of affairs where we live in a state that's bent on shredding the 2A and willing to sue its own citizens for unconstitutional gun laws.
Sounds like they want to make it like buying an NFA item just to make it a PITA as much as possible to discourage people from buying guns in general. What a screw.This is just some of the permit to purchase requirements.
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, no 14 dealer may deliver a pistol or semiautomatic assault rifle to the purchaser thereof until:
The dealer is notified in writing by (i) the chief of 5 police or the sheriff of the jurisdiction in which the purchaser 6 resides that the purchaser is eligible to possess a ((pistol)) 7 firearm under RCW 9.41.040 and that the application to purchase is 8 approved by the chief of police or sheriff; or (ii) the state that 9 the purchaser is eligible to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040, as 10 provided in subsection (((3))) (2)(b) of this section; ((or)) and 11 (((c))) (b) The requirements ((or)) and time periods in RCW 9.41.092 have been satisfied.
The state, through the legislature or initiative process, may 16 enact a statewide firearms background check system equivalent to, or 17 more comprehensive than, the check required by (a) of this subsection 18 to determine that a purchaser is eligible to possess a firearm under 19 RCW 9.41.040. Once a state system is established, a dealer shall use 20 the state system and national instant criminal background check 21 system, provided for by the Brady handgun violence prevention act (18 22 U.S.C. Sec. 921 et seq.), to make criminal background checks of applicants to purchase firearms.
The County Sheriff's will be really happy to be the ones to make Washington a safer place I'm sure.This is just some of the permit to purchase requirements.
In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, no 14 dealer may deliver a pistol or semiautomatic assault rifle to the purchaser thereof until:
The dealer is notified in writing by (i) the chief of 5 police or the sheriff of the jurisdiction in which the purchaser 6 resides that the purchaser is eligible to possess a ((pistol)) 7 firearm under RCW 9.41.040 and that the application to purchase is 8 approved by the chief of police or sheriff; or (ii) the state that 9 the purchaser is eligible to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040, as 10 provided in subsection (((3))) (2)(b) of this section; ((or)) and 11 (((c))) (b) The requirements ((or)) and time periods in RCW 9.41.092 have been satisfied.
The state, through the legislature or initiative process, may 16 enact a statewide firearms background check system equivalent to, or 17 more comprehensive than, the check required by (a) of this subsection 18 to determine that a purchaser is eligible to possess a firearm under 19 RCW 9.41.040. Once a state system is established, a dealer shall use 20 the state system and national instant criminal background check 21 system, provided for by the Brady handgun violence prevention act (18 22 U.S.C. Sec. 921 et seq.), to make criminal background checks of applicants to purchase firearms.
Yep we are on a path right now Imo of legislatures in places like CA, WA, OR, Illinois, NJ passing laws they know are unconstitutional. These will be overturned by the courts in time. So we have empower those fighting for our rights in the courts. It sucks but that is our current reality.I've already sold off almost everything. Just keeping the 3 I think I need. Nothing to do with this proposed law, but more of an age related time to downsize kind of thing.
I did donate 1/2 of the funds I recieved to GOA, NRA, and 2 others. I am writing letters, sending emails, and calling every elected office in the state to voice my opinion against this.
I feel my "recreational budget" is better spent defending my dwindling rights.
It's not about money at all. It's about control.I don't know why they are trying to put a Permit to purchase in place.... The max amount they can charge is 25$....
I could solve that problem with one solution, and they would make more money for the "transportation department" LOL.
A concealed Pistol License (CPL) is 55$ and you are required to submit fingerprints and get the extensive background check, you are literally applying for this "purchase permit" in the same way.
Just make it a requirement (Country Sharrif and state law Enforcment can communicate and share info for all I care) and all the leg work is done, they will make an extra 25$ on top.
Basic math, the solution also covers all Legal gun owners as we already hold this permit........ Just my thought of common sense and moving int he right direction. I'm all for proper Gun laws and you can own the guns you want if you follow the proper channels and get the right documentation, Just saying.
What yearly background check are you referring to? I get them everyyear for work, obviously, different than that related to firearms.Imo lines and wait aren't the issue re the permit to purchase. Getting on Washington's registry is the critical issue. Regulations are increasing every year and people on the registry will be receiving 100% of that. Fe you will have to do mandatory background checks to continue to own registered guns. That yearly background check is already law in WA. And more laws are coming. If you are registered you will have to comply with them all unfortunately.
Redundancy at best, particularly with CPL holders, but it's about pandering to the anti gunners on top of a money grab. Bunch of bull**** as far as I'm concerned.I don't know why they are trying to put a Permit to purchase in place.... The max amount they can charge is 25$....
I could solve that problem with one solution, and they would make more money for the "transportation department" LOL.
A concealed Pistol License (CPL) is 55$ and you are required to submit fingerprints and get the extensive background check, you are literally applying for this "purchase permit" in the same way.
Just make it a requirement (Country Sharrif and state law Enforcment can communicate and share info for all I care) and all the leg work is done, they will make an extra 25$ on top.
Basic math, the solution also covers all Legal gun owners as we already hold this permit........ Just my thought of common sense and moving int he right direction. I'm all for proper Gun laws and you can own the guns you want if you follow the proper channels and get the right documentation, Just saying.
Mandatory yearly background checks was passed into law in WA in 2018. WA has been unable to implement it. With the new gun registry they will have a system that identifies the guns and owners so that they can implement it (among any other regulations that are pending and also future regulations).What yearly background check are you referring to? I get them everyyear for work, obviously, different than that related to firearms.
Sounds good though for some idiot politician to brag about their useless achievement.Didn't New York or some garbage State pass some smart fun technology requirement that it's yet to be implemented because it doesn't exist?
California implemented a requirement for firing pins to microstamp the gun's serial number on each casing when they are fired. Not that it's impossible to do, just highly impractical and stupidly expensive, so no gun companies are willing to do it.Didn't New York or some garbage State pass some smart fun technology requirement that it's yet to be implemented because it doesn't exist?