National The importance of "common use" in preventing semi auto rifle bans, ATF makes a huge mistake!

[CamoDeafie]

Heller specifically talks about classes of weaponry that are 2A protected. This seems to me to indicate that depending on the Courts, an AWB of sorts or adding Assault Weapons would not be successfully defended in a District Court on the basis of the type of weaponry being banned because as we can understand for example in the Oregon IP18 proposal, it can cover pretty much all semi automatic rifles depending on how broad the Ban is worded... and Heller very specifically said semiautomatic handguns are commonly possessed throughout the nation for lawful uses; and it can be followed through to be the same for semiautomatic rifles by virtue of whats not banned. Mark Smith in a video recenty pointed out that as far as we know, there isn't a large popular push to ban or prohibit all Semiautomatic Rifles in existence, but indeed there is always a push for a specific subset of semiautomatic rifles (namely, the ARs/AKs/ "Assault Weapons"). So far there needs to be a SCOTUS suit or decision protecting semiautomatic rifles under the 2A, then logically (right... ) a suit covering the SBRs in NFA can be decided in favor of 2A and in favor of removing SBRs from NFA if SCOTUS declares semiautomatic rifles and all other rifles are 2A protected.