- Messages
- 18,744
- Reactions
- 45,458
See above.sure you can....under SB501 you can shoot four mags per month.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See above.sure you can....under SB501 you can shoot four mags per month.
Why do we need guns? Because there are crazies running around with hatchets and long knives. That's why.
Hatchet-wielding man accused of breaking Portland fire station window
View attachment 536709
Why do we need guns? Because there are crazies running around with hatchets and long knives. That's why.
Hatchet-wielding man accused of breaking Portland fire station window
View attachment 536709
IMO, Not EVERYONE should own a gun. Surely even the most staunch 2A advocate can think of someone who shouldn't.
View attachment 536720
Dont forget what they usually have with them as well. METH! or other hard drugs. But hey those drugs aren't punished as hard in Oregon anymore so its ok.
Now a gun as we all know is far more dangerous than illegal drugs that keep finding ways to trickle into nice neighborhoods or DIY kits to cook. We all know drugs cannot possibly kill more than those evil bang sticks. All they've done is switch optics. They know they cannot control drugs so we'll go after the next thing associated with it, the Guns or at least the people who own them.
Fortunately he isn't breathing anyone's air anymore though he did use way too much before he finally kicked off.IMO he should too, it is up to civilized society to take him out when he f****s up.
So why is he breathing my air?
Fortunately he isn't breathing anyone's air anymore though he did use way too much before he finally kicked off.
This would be the kind of thing that if or when they get it, they would make some provision to have mags made to only hold 5. Pretty sure this has been done before for the 10 or 15 round limits IIRC. I am sure the people who are championing this have no plan for it to go in as written. They are expecting the gun owners to kiss their butts when they offer a "compromise". For decades now gun owners have been willing to give up rights a little at a time in the name of "compromise". Gun owners never notice it only goes one way. So assuming this again does not wake up the gun owners sleeping life away they will end up with something along the lines of CA type laws. Gun owners will go along and blame the NRA for it as they continue to vote into office the people who gave them the new laws.how many handguns have 5 round mags for them? I dont think any of the glocks do. This is pretty much a handgun ban as well.
I would argue that Manson and the like forfeited their right to life when they did their heinous acts.Because even a scumbag's life is precious. Even more than our gun rights. Sure, there's been a fair number of people I'd like to see wiped off the planet, but that's best left up to God. And He didn't give us guns, or the right to bear them. Sure wish that was in the Bible tho'! Would be a different world for sure.
Sell your cloak and buy a sword (Luke 22:36)...Likely the weapon of the day.Because even a scumbag's life is precious. Even more than our gun rights. Sure, there's been a fair number of people I'd like to see wiped off the planet, but that's best left up to God. And He didn't give us guns, or the right to bear them. Sure wish that was in the Bible tho'! Would be a different world for sure.
Remind me - what again is the exact reason for such a harsh anti-gun/anti-gunner push? When was the last time recently that we've had any issue that would warrant such an absurdly unnecessary set of punishments for gunners?
We all recall the college shooting - but other than that...I'm drawing a blank. Violent criminal pricks are gonna be violent criminal pricks, regardless of what Salem does. Why punish us as law-abiding Oregonians?
Idaho land is still sorta cheap, right?