Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 16,909
- Reactions
- 27,800
It's about PROTECTING Americans. From "disinformation".Can't have a war without a Ministry of Truth to push your propaganda.
Aloha, Mark
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's about PROTECTING Americans. From "disinformation".Can't have a war without a Ministry of Truth to push your propaganda.
on 5/3/2022, 8:47:20 PM by lightmanWell, to ME, there is no doubt that the BIg Business/Money Interests (and that could also include the media) uses their power(s)......to skew the narrative(s) to what they believe is the "correct way to go".
Then......
I also assume that leaks (to the News Media) have a purpose too. And it's NOT always done for a "GOOD" purpose. Yeah.....which side is/was the "GOOD SIDE?"
LOL......
Were we.....
Was it always meant.....
That everyone could/would/should see through every detail? Call it "transparency?"
Aloha, Mark
The way Russia is working, my bet is that if Russia has to retreat, that Russia will try to destroy Ukraine ships and dock/port facilities.So it sounds like they need to get on the stick and sink all those ship so they can get their economy back.
I don't know how that guy can tie only fire info as progress. For example Russians can bombard a civilian area and it will show up as fires and it may not be anything to do with "progress". I'm not saying he is wrong I'm just saying he is drawing a lot of inferences from only one type of data.
Yea I hear you. I was scratching my head at that. I don't know what inputs the generators of that site uses to make battle line claims.I don't know how that guy can tie only fire info as progress. For example Russians can bombard a civilian area and it will show up as fires and it may not be anything to do with "progress". I'm not saying he is wrong I'm just saying he is drawing a lot of inferences from only one type of data.
I appreciate hearing all info from ppl making an honest effort to be unbiased and objective like this guy's info you posted even if has some guesswork.Yea I hear you. I was scratching my head at that. I don't know what inputs the generators of that site uses to make battle line claims.
This space agency guy has spouted off before. About nukes early on in the invasion and then saying maybe they should just leave the usa astronaut in space on the space station instead of bring him back. I think he was the one who also said "why should there be a world if there is no Russia" speaking of willingness to use nuclear weapons. He's a nut job and mouthpiece to scare people for Putin.Glad we have a sharp mind and steady hand near our buttons /s
Russian space agency chief boasts nuclear capabilities, claims NATO would lose 'in 30 minutes'
Russia has pushed the threat of nuclear war as a "theme" for this year's Victory Day parade on May 9 as the conflict in Ukraine continues.www.foxnews.com
It would've been like WWII but with drones.I wonder how World War 2 would have been fought if all sides had drones back then?