- Messages
- 4,435
- Reactions
- 8,788
Underwood's .32 +p has 110 less ft/lbs and 15 less grain weight than their standard pressure .380 round. Not to mention 200 FPS slower. That's a strange argument to try and have. And ok, I'll keep my .380 and its FAR superior ballistics. No problem.![]()
The Newtonian laws of physics, being what they are, requires that there is at least 100% more recoil in the .380 Auto than in the .32 Auto. Therefore it is a logical conclusion that there will be a great deal more recoil in the same size of frame than there is in the .32 Auto. This is an irrefutable fact; 14 inches of penetration in 10% ordnance gelatin is more than adequate to accomplish the task at hand.
I can empty a .32 Auto as "quick as a wink". The "Mozambique Drill" can be accomplished twice within the capacity of a single magazine in my steel-frame .32 Auto before requiring a reload.
Think about it.