JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Honestly, if folks won't vote out this antigun bunch after the way they handled covid then we are done for. It means even the short term memories are burnt out. Hopefully today even the democrats see we need a change and really there is no reason not to change because over the last 30+ years of democrat rule the dems got most everything they wanted.
Yep. Parts of Salem now look worse than Eugene when Jerry Garcia was still alive. Sidewalks smell like piss.

Same people running the show in Oregon for decades.
 
Yep. Parts of Salem now look worse than Eugene when Jerry Garcia was still alive. Sidewalks smell like piss.

Same people running the show in Oregon for decades.
Dems have run the state into the ground and then used covid to bury it. Homeless camps all over western Oregon, taxes raised sky high, rents sky high, inflation destroying the system so there is no question folks should vote R just for change and getting the anti gun bunch out of office.


For decades the left has been trying to turn us into kali, you would think covid would have opened some eyes to stop the move.
 
@E4mafia nailed it. The article oozes fudd energy.

Once again they use a person who happens to own a gun as an example for gun-guys (and girls).. like those idiots that chop up their firearms on camera.. they may as well light money on fire to better virtue signal.

Firearm ownership has little to do with hunting. I loath that they always try and connect the two.
Anti-2A proponents usually push the idea of an essential connection between gun owning and hunting because they want to project the idea that hunting is the only legitimate reason for gun ownership. If they can get listeners to accept that tenet, it will be easy to get most people who aren't hunters to think removing gun rights affects few people. In addition, it makes it seem okay to ban nearly all guns, as you can hunt with single shot long guns. In addition, most Americans are now urban, and more urbanites every generation don't hunt, have never had to protect livestock from predators, and are against hunting. So if guns are projected as only legitimately for hunting, any anti-hunters can be added to those against banning all guns in civilian hands.
 
Some may not like it but this would be effective.

BBA8048E-EC0C-47AE-902C-66F464A49DB4.jpeg
 
Some may not like it but this would be effective.

View attachment 1307730
People by and large.... Americans in particular... are not willing to make the mental switch from "let's work together" to "let's execute people"... things will have to get much more desperate, much more difficult,.much more violent before that is an option on the steps of the Capitol. And with SCOTUS/Fed courts seemingly working in 2A favor.. I will wager that most "2A supporters" would rather wait on the Court decisions before kitting up and consider stacking bodies.
 
If it passes, ignore it. Million ways to skin a cat. And it's unconstitutional as hell.
Laws that we think are unconstitutional nevertheless remain in force until such a time as they are repealed as such. If the measure passes, ignoring it would be...unwise.
 
Don't give up so easily. as of 935pm the "no" is leading

View attachment 1307733
Those numbers are wrong. Current numbers are shown in link below. The numbers are supposed to be updated at 10 pm (fwiw).

 

Upcoming Events

New Classified Ads

Back Top