Court trials reject evidence all the time. Without knowing the reason we cant judge it was intentional.
And therefore should be victims of libtard Soros backed DAs.
Yeah, I saw a couple articles on that. No reason to assume he didn't put those comments in various social media, so his conviction looks like a self inflicted wound.A bit more context...
Im guessing this had a lot to do with the conviction.
"During the trial, which began March 27, prosecutors showed the jury text messages and social media communications where Perry talked about killing protesters in the weeks before the shooting. "I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex," he wrote to a friend in June 2020. On another occasion he said, "I might go to Dallas to shoot looters." In DMs, according to reporting by the Austin Chronicle, a fellow gun owner warned him: "We went through the same training," he said. "Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot.""
U.S. Army Sgt. Guilty in Murder of BLM Protester
In 2020, Army Sgt. Daniel Perry drove his car into a crowd of people protesting police brutality in Austin, Texas, and fatally shot Garrett Fosterwww.rollingstone.com
All I know is this isn't a clear case of self defense, it wont be one I'm going to use to say the libtard DAs are politicizing trials.
There is a difference between "want to" and "have to". Let's not forget who was doing the rioting and burning of cities across the country.
Yup, self inflicted.
Would a conservative backed DA be more inclined to let him talk about killing people and then do it?
Its true that people sometimes say things they dont mean literally. But his texts were quite literal....
Abbott is allegedly working on a pardon. I'm not comfortable with that quick turn unless they can show prosecutorial misconduct of some sort. It's just going to embolden the radical leftists to increase the aggression resulting in a lot more fatal conflicts.
It was ordered to be withheld by his superiors.... not the courts... and not introduced during the grand jury hearing. I dunno if they could have or if he tried to introduce it later on during the trial, or if the court then decided to exclude it for whatever reason.
Yup, If Abbot secures a pardon this will hurt self defense rights badly. This is not a clear case of self defense.
Yep, if there is a pardon there will be more riots or retribution.
Like Rittenhouse.
Not likely, but a conservative backed DA might not weigh smack talk as heavily and base it soley on the actions of both parties in that moment... not convict on the theory that he said what he was going to do and then he did it.... then bury any details that might not fit that narrative.
