To clarify I'm referring to violent felons. I'm ok with non violent felons owning guns.Right here:
Where is "off the street" that isn't jail? You didn't say anything about violence, but prohibited people (felons) and trust. How else would you interpret this statement?
Public policy has little to do with whether tempered glass is a good security barrier. Cars, like houses, can be perfectly good places to leave a gun - if the gun is locked in a way that a casual thief can't remove it in 10 seconds.
There is always this striking disconnect in these discussions between people's beliefs about how this "ought to be" and physical reality. Unless you don't believe that theft exists, why argue that you have no responsibility to make some effort to prevent it using materials that are proof against basic tools like rocks.
You seem to make a lot of presuppositions to lead into your arguments, Ive never suggested people shouldnt take responsibility. My only position is im against making the crime victim liable for the actions of others. Do you truly feel the best way to reduce gun thefts is to punish the theft victim? How come we didnt pass a law holding the thief accountable for the actions of the person he sells the stolen gun to?