- Messages
- 18,279
- Reactions
- 35,525
Dang ! Finally some common sense!Really who doesn't take measures to fix something after the first time you get robbed!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dang ! Finally some common sense!Really who doesn't take measures to fix something after the first time you get robbed!
Not really a small business the only gun store in Bellevue just outside of Seattle city limits so I'm going to say they made lots of money just from ammo sales after Seattle passed the tax on ammoSmall businesses who can't afford to.
There is nothing you can do if someone wants to take what you have they will find a way people still Rob Banks even though 98%of bank robbers get caught
I didn't get the figure - it was estimated in a previous post from another member
Now its starting to sound like insurance fraud! Really who doesn't take measures to fix something after the first time you get robbed!
Then argue the number with him - not me. - BUT it 's probably pretty accurate - heck i write off more non-billable employee time than this per year where I work - but then we probably gross a bit more than this place...That doesn't make it a fact.
Now its starting to sound like insurance fraud! Really who doesn't take measures to fix something after the first time you get robbed!
Then argue the number with him - not me. - BUT it 's probably pretty accurate - heck i write off more non-billable employee time than this per year where I work - but then we probably gross a bit more than this place...
Ok 60% was going of some S#-+ I heard on TV but 60% is more than 50% lol I didn't have time to look it up lol 98%sounds better lolWhile I agree with your first point, the second is not accurate. There are roughly sixty percent of bank robbers that are caught. FBI uniform crime statistics: Getting away with robbery? Don't bank on it
Small businesses who can't afford to.
Well damn man - I am glad you find my logic FLAWED - so why not produce something that makes sense then?So not only are your numbers made up, your logic is completely flawed....
Well damn man - I am glad you find my logic FLAWED - so why not produce something that makes sense then?
Well try this - I based my 'flawed' logic on one burglary that might have been avoided by approximately 520 hours of 'bad' time to secure the guns - but as stated this has been possibly THREE times for his shop ? Kinda makes the 520 hours invested to secure the guns look a little more cost effective don't you think?
Lol the last I heard it was more than 60 % but like I said that was years ago lol you mean to tell me that the government has not got better but worse at catching criminal's sense then LOLDon't beat yourself up, it's only a 38% spread.![]()
I just did post something that makes sense. I completely debunked your made up numbers and flawed logic. Again you quote 520 hours that someone else just merely made up and posted. And a $20 wage that was proven to be unlikely.
AGAIN, the damage and stolen guns are an insurance loss for him. Paying labor wages is not, that comes out of his revenue and reduces his profits. I don't know how I can break it down for you any further. Man up and admit you made some assumptions that made absolutely no sense.
Are you considering the DAMAGE (and potential crime, pain, and suffering) that may no doubt exude from the criminal element these guns will most likely end up in? Or will the insurance company cover that also?AGAIN, the damage and stolen guns are an insurance loss for him.
Damn, time for a new location. Surprised they can still get insurance.This is the 3rd time same store