Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 1,729
- Reactions
- 876
Those big bad "assault weapons" are good protection. I want to be able to have the ability in the case of a large natural disaster or civil uprising to be able to protect my home and family from more than a couple of people. We have a gang problem and do you really think that all of them are just going to become nice and accomodating or could they, since they've already bonded, take from those who have none, or limited, defenses? They sure can. I want to at least stand a chance. But banning those are not going to stop the criminal element from having them so it will just make it harder to be able to defend myself and my family. It still irritates me that a handful of people do something bad and 80 million of us have to suffer for it. And then they'll just create new "gun free zones" and that will stop nothing. But they want to FEEL like they are doing something when the real fix would be hard work and costly (both to freedoms and to the budget). I'm hoping that sanity will prevail but I'm skeptical that it will. It's so frustrating.