I'd dispute the idea that some people can't be trusted to reload. If you're that careless, I don't want you at the range when I'm there, that's for sure!
Maybe rifle ammo would be an exception. Judging brass for potential case head separation sounds tricky. I only reload for handguns. Most handgun rounds are pretty simple. Yes, double-charging a case is a risk. You can prevent that by using Trail Boss, which is almost too bulky to double in any case. In most calibers, you can also prevent it by using a big charge of a relatively slow powder, which either won't fit or will be really obvious if you bother to look AT ALL. Yes, that costs a little more but powder is one of the cheaper components in most cases, so it's cheap insurance. If you sort your brass, you can even check AFTER loading by weighing every round. Won't work with tiny charges of fast powder, but I've never found cases and bullets to vary enough that a double charge of slower powder would escape detection.
Agreed that reloading 9 mm is a horrible prospect. I've been resisting adding those dies to my collection. But ya gotta do what ya gotta do.
I doubt politicians or initiative writers are too dumb to figure out reloading. They *might* miss it on the first try, but eventually primers (if they're smart) or powder or both would be regulated.
Or bullets, if they're really dumb. I have a couple of bullet molds, but I doubt I'll ever start casting. Of course, the problem there is that lead is scarcer with the demise of wheelweights and buying fresh lead is not very economical, and might also become illegal.
So, definitely a good idea to buy a bung-load of primers ASAP. I'm less sanguine about keeping large amounts of powder around, due to the worry of a fire. Even in my garage...
And I'm really wondering why I didn't buy a 5000 round case of .22LR a few months ago from the CMP when they were available! I have a fair bit of .22 now, but not a lifetime supply. Another 5000 might have taken me on out!
Maybe rifle ammo would be an exception. Judging brass for potential case head separation sounds tricky. I only reload for handguns. Most handgun rounds are pretty simple. Yes, double-charging a case is a risk. You can prevent that by using Trail Boss, which is almost too bulky to double in any case. In most calibers, you can also prevent it by using a big charge of a relatively slow powder, which either won't fit or will be really obvious if you bother to look AT ALL. Yes, that costs a little more but powder is one of the cheaper components in most cases, so it's cheap insurance. If you sort your brass, you can even check AFTER loading by weighing every round. Won't work with tiny charges of fast powder, but I've never found cases and bullets to vary enough that a double charge of slower powder would escape detection.
Agreed that reloading 9 mm is a horrible prospect. I've been resisting adding those dies to my collection. But ya gotta do what ya gotta do.
I doubt politicians or initiative writers are too dumb to figure out reloading. They *might* miss it on the first try, but eventually primers (if they're smart) or powder or both would be regulated.
Or bullets, if they're really dumb. I have a couple of bullet molds, but I doubt I'll ever start casting. Of course, the problem there is that lead is scarcer with the demise of wheelweights and buying fresh lead is not very economical, and might also become illegal.
So, definitely a good idea to buy a bung-load of primers ASAP. I'm less sanguine about keeping large amounts of powder around, due to the worry of a fire. Even in my garage...
And I'm really wondering why I didn't buy a 5000 round case of .22LR a few months ago from the CMP when they were available! I have a fair bit of .22 now, but not a lifetime supply. Another 5000 might have taken me on out!