- Messages
- 3,991
- Reactions
- 7,983
I had a Long Branch No.2 Mk IV, never fired given to me by a dear friend. Unfortunately it was stolen during a move and I didn't discover it till later. Beautiful rifle with a brass butt plate.
Brutus
Brutus
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah - supply and demand.
Even old surplus rifles like the FR8 Mauser, SKS, Enfields and such, have gone up in price.
I guess I am kind of lucky in that I picked up some of these rifles when they were relatively inexpensive.
I tried the FR8 Mauser and found that you had to be pretty picky with them. A lot of them were rather battered. Then they were "discovered" and the price went up. I gave mine to a friend as it wouldn't feed reliably due to wear and field use. Nice little carbine though.
I prefer the Enfields.
Amen! Glad I bought mine when I did.
Painful as it is to buy at todays prices. Better to pick up the ones you want.
They will look cheep in 10 years.
They would be, and one could argue, still are the most effective weapon in regards to it's high degree of efficacy with the least amount of training, especially in moments under duress; if a person can pick one up and fire at least one shot in the general direction of a threat, their chances are better than with a commiserate amount of familiarity with a pistol or rifle, to speak in generalities of course.Just to be a knuckle head I'd make the case that it was the smoothbore that "won the west".
All the way from flintlock fowlers in the eastern frontier to breech loading "farm guns" of the 19th century.
You come across smooth bore references in way too many first person accounts to not realize just how common they were.
Andy
My first thought is that a SHTF firearm (and one's selection of such a firearm) should be as immune to trends and other external circumstances as can be, not what is popular at the moment. Nothing is 100% impervious to outside influences or ideal for every moment (ammo availability, usability in multiple scenarios) but the more factors that can be eliminated or prepared for, the better. As well, it should have some built in multiple-use qualities, as I'm a big proponent of 'two is one, and one is none' philosophy. I think a shotgun comes in the top 3 of 'should haves', based on my observations only. It's not as sexy as an AR or most other MBR's, but it can be pretty darn diverse platform with an adjustable choke barrel, an integral scope mount slug barrel, and a set of chamber inserts (other guages as well as centerfire pistol/rifle and .22 rimfire inserts). True that inserts make a shotgun into a 'one shot wonder', but it is still one shot more than not having a gun chambered in a round that happens to be available. I also like to apply the cowboy double concept to the guns I choose, as then I only need to reload one round to feed two guns, two different use guns like a carbine rifle and a pistol. Flip side is if you run out of that round, that's two guns out of service.
Anyways, not exactly what Joe is asking, but I'd say for around $300, a shotgun gives someone a lot of options.