- Messages
- 6,985
- Reactions
- 21,487
IMPORTANT NOTICE : The Return of SB941
Meaning anyone who violated SB941 as listed above condition could not register said firearm because it either was sold illegally, or purchased illegally; furthermore the OSP would have records on who had said firearms that fell within ballot 43 guidelines and failed to register them if needed.
This would make those who chose to violate the law now guilty of a felony and there are records to prove it.
B: Being the OSP not just stores but has sales records in place of what was bought in the last 5 years any and all firearms falling in the guidelines must be registered, failure to do so could have complications if said firearms was bought at a FFL and now shows you on record as the owner of a firearm withing Ballot 43 guidelines and you don't have it ??
This ballot measure would ensure that many who violated SB941 would be caught, furthermore all who claim they wont comply to ballot 43 if passed wont matter if they register or not as the OSP has searchable records of all firearm sales the last 5 years ( possibly longer) so if you bought one in that time frame they know.
I have tried to discuss this with OFF and the NRA and they will not act on anything until it passes if it does.
So being I was talking to deaf ears I felt a public service was needed to post here as the people should know.
This is not legal advice but all this can be confirmed, by contacting the OSP, looking at FBI records and reviewing hearings on SB941.
Its easy to point fingers how this occurred but this is serious and could be criminal for some.
I am sure many follow the law, but even it ballot 43 passes and you refuse to register they will know what you have if you did so the last 5 years. Ballot measure 43 doesn't create a registration as much as it enhances what they already have and could create one or two felonies for some.
Its a bad bad ballot measure get active your freedom may depend on it. Unless you like a 6x9 cell.
DH
EDIT:
Note :
No one here needs to follow what I have posted, this is based on my experience with my involvement in SB941, the problem with all gun laws is they are all flawed, but that has never stopped the antis from going after the law abiding. So please either take or leave what I posted, its not up to me whom goes to jail or is charged. And yes there are loopholes in the laws, but often you get to argue that with your lawyer in court those facts. SB941 its self is unlawful yet three year later it stands, if #43 passes it is also flawed and illegal it would be foolish to not at least entertain where this could head.
DH
- Oregon, August 2015 was the active date of SB941 and as many know this eliminated private sales in Oregon unless a FFL was used to transfer said firearm. ( unless was transferred to a family member)
- Between 2015 and 2018( mid) based on FBI background checks on new firearms approx 47,000 rifles were sold in Oregon that might fall underneath the new Ballot Measure should it pass. ( was based on rifles only)
- Fact: In 2015 hearings Senator Prozanski wenton public record when discussing background check stated none existed. However the State of Oregons OSP policy is 5 years of records retention. It was later increased to 10 years by Gov Brown, but for this post is negligible, because we are still within 5 years of SB941 Passing.
- Fact all new firearms purchased after 8/2015 are not only part of FFL records but are part of the OSP no less then 5 year record retention, and most likely 10 years.
- Fact any new firearm purchased between 8/2015 and Present ( 4/2018) would be included in these records that were retained at the OSP.
- Fact the OSP retains what , whom and where said firearm was purchased.
- Fact anyone selling a new firearms they purchased after 8/2015 and present and resold to a private party and exempted themselves to use a FFL would be in direct violation of SB941.
- Fact anyone selling, buying any firearm after 8/2015 and present and failed to use a FFL would also be in direct violation of SB941.
Meaning anyone who violated SB941 as listed above condition could not register said firearm because it either was sold illegally, or purchased illegally; furthermore the OSP would have records on who had said firearms that fell within ballot 43 guidelines and failed to register them if needed.
This would make those who chose to violate the law now guilty of a felony and there are records to prove it.
B: Being the OSP not just stores but has sales records in place of what was bought in the last 5 years any and all firearms falling in the guidelines must be registered, failure to do so could have complications if said firearms was bought at a FFL and now shows you on record as the owner of a firearm withing Ballot 43 guidelines and you don't have it ??
This ballot measure would ensure that many who violated SB941 would be caught, furthermore all who claim they wont comply to ballot 43 if passed wont matter if they register or not as the OSP has searchable records of all firearm sales the last 5 years ( possibly longer) so if you bought one in that time frame they know.
I have tried to discuss this with OFF and the NRA and they will not act on anything until it passes if it does.
So being I was talking to deaf ears I felt a public service was needed to post here as the people should know.
This is not legal advice but all this can be confirmed, by contacting the OSP, looking at FBI records and reviewing hearings on SB941.
Its easy to point fingers how this occurred but this is serious and could be criminal for some.
I am sure many follow the law, but even it ballot 43 passes and you refuse to register they will know what you have if you did so the last 5 years. Ballot measure 43 doesn't create a registration as much as it enhances what they already have and could create one or two felonies for some.
Its a bad bad ballot measure get active your freedom may depend on it. Unless you like a 6x9 cell.
DH
EDIT:
Note :
No one here needs to follow what I have posted, this is based on my experience with my involvement in SB941, the problem with all gun laws is they are all flawed, but that has never stopped the antis from going after the law abiding. So please either take or leave what I posted, its not up to me whom goes to jail or is charged. And yes there are loopholes in the laws, but often you get to argue that with your lawyer in court those facts. SB941 its self is unlawful yet three year later it stands, if #43 passes it is also flawed and illegal it would be foolish to not at least entertain where this could head.
DH
Last Edited: