- Messages
- 5,069
- Reactions
- 11,352
He needs a berm or high wall on that property line to contain ricochets. What he's doing is flat out reckless. It may be legal - for now - but those kind of antics are eventually going to get someone injured. His backstop is his shed - beyond that is a canal and other homes. He's got an apartment building near to his "range" that could be struck by ricocheting rounds.Its people like you that think there needs to be a law for everything. Yes, you are the problem, not the home owner doing what ever he feels like doing safely
I notice you're in Texas as well. Law here in Texas says rounds may not leave your property, and most counties have an ordinance requiring 10+ acres that are not in a platted subdivision in order to lawfully shoot on your property. We have a hair under 3 acres ourselves, and unless I dug a deep pit, or built a covered range bermed on 3 sides, there's no way I could safely shoot on my property even if it were legal, and the closest homes to mine are a lot further away than this gentleman's.
This guy looks like he doesn't even have half an acre, and he's surrounded by residences, shooting in his driveway. Good luck finding people to agree that such behavior is safe, and its because of people who act unreasonably on their own like this guy, that "lawmakers" put stupid restrictions into the law like minimal lot sizes, or flat out ban shooting that isn't on an official range.
The guy in the video talked about doing things safely, and how he spent over $600 on his tiny little back stop - but put zero effort into containing ricochets from leaving his property. I don't think you need a statutory minimal lot size, but I also don't think you should be popping rounds off in a residential area in the open. Your range should be sufficient to contain the rounds fired. If the guy wants to build a reinforced range in his garage - with appropriately strong walls / ceiling - go for it, but no way would I get behind what he's doing.