- Messages
- 11
- Reactions
- 0
Most of my threads have a certain amount of a "tongue-in-cheek" intent to them, but this is completely serious. This thread has the potential to go very wrong but it also has the potential to be quite thought provoking. I am hoping it is a frank discussion that we can all be adult and honest about. I feel being able to understand and discuss this subject is a very big part of being competent to carry a deadly weapon. It has been discussed before but it is a topic that needs repeating from time to time.
This topic was brought up in another thread today on another forum and I thought it deserved it's own thread.
When it comes to shooting an attacker, our intent should always be "shoot to stop" and not "shoot to kill." You want to stop the action which is presenting a clear and present danger to yourself, to loved ones, or to innocent parties. You never want to make it personal enough to be intending to kill the assailant. Once you cross that line you seriously undermine your own position and competence. You become a bad guy yourself to some degree.
That being said, I can be adult enough to admit there would be times when "shoot to kill" would probably be my intent alongside stopping the threat. I could very easily see myself crossing that line if someone was intentionally trying to seriously injure or kill a loved one or a child. I would like to think I could keep emotion out of the situation and only be intending to stop the present threat, but I am afraid I am only human and could easily allow myself to be overtaken by anger and fear in such a situation.
I do not think that makes me, or anyone else like me, unfit to carry a gun. I just think it makes us human. I do not think someone needs to be perfect to be armed. I think they just have to be aware of the reality of being armed with a deadly weapon and the weight/responsibility that comes with it.
Thoughts?
Here are my thoughts on this matter.
If and I mean if I have to defend myself where I have to pull the trigger on my 40-cal....its is to stop that individual at all cost, otherwise your best bet is to keep it holstered. There cannot be any shades of gray. Your either within the law to defend yourself from clear and present danger or your not.
And in which case I will follow what police had told me many times if I have to defend myself. 2 to body and 1 to the head....you put your threat down.
My two cents anyways.
Conan