- Messages
- 802
- Reactions
- 325
I know the law is the law and none of us really want to break it. But sometimes they're too inclusive while being too vague. Conjecture I've heard is things like the burden is on the seller. Or it's nearly impossible to prove so the law isn't really being enforced. Has anybody seen actual charges brought or a case tried? A sting? A better legal interpretation of who would be charged if a violation occurred?
Scenario one, I receive a firearm from a friend or Co worker to see if I can get it functioning correctly. Things somehow go south, maybe a traffic stop and they see a gun that wasn't legally transferred to me in my car, can I be charged? Can they be charged?
Scenario two, I just don't give a hoot for the law and sell a gun or buy a gun without going through a bcg. Again, it's somehow found out. What if anything is going to happen to the seller? To the buyer?
Scenario one, I receive a firearm from a friend or Co worker to see if I can get it functioning correctly. Things somehow go south, maybe a traffic stop and they see a gun that wasn't legally transferred to me in my car, can I be charged? Can they be charged?
Scenario two, I just don't give a hoot for the law and sell a gun or buy a gun without going through a bcg. Again, it's somehow found out. What if anything is going to happen to the seller? To the buyer?